Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add johnqtcg/awesome-skills --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high System Prompt Leakage · line 236 Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.05117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02047 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00512 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash(go test*), Bash(go build*), Bash(go run*), Bash(go vet*), Bash(go mod graph*), Bash(go generate*), Bash(go clean*), Bash(git log*), Bash(git diff*), Bash(npm ls*), Bash(python3 -m un How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Debugging
Overview
Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues and usually force a second debugging cycle.
Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting a permanent fix. Symptom fixes are failure.
Debugging report quality is part of the job. A report that lists guesses without evidence is not a passing debugging result.
The Iron Law
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
Phase 1 always applies. How much of Phases 2-4 apply, and what the final report requires, is set by Severity Triage and Scope & Mode below — read both before investigating.
Diagnostic Instrumentation Exemption
Adding temporary code to collect evidence is NOT a fix. Permitted during Phase 1: print/log statements, temporary breakpoints or debug flags, probe scripts, temporary test harnesses, system commands (df -h, lsof, strace, tcpdump) to observe runtime state. "Permitted" here is about scope (it's investigation, not a fix), not about pre-approval — tcpdump and env specifically are not pre-approved in allowed-tools and require asking first; see references/safety-and-authorization.md.
Rules: mark diagnostic code clearly (// DEBUG-INVESTIGATION or # DIAG), remove it after root cause is identified, and it must not change program behavior — only observe.
When to Use
Use for any technical issue: test failures, bugs in production, unexpected behavior, performance problems, build failures, integration issues, flaky tests, race conditions, Configuration drift, third-party breakage.
Use this ESPECIALLY when: under time pressure, "just one quick fix" seems obvious, you've already tried multiple fixes, a previous fix didn't work, or you don't fully understand the issue.
Severity Triage (Do This First)
+----------+---------------------+------------------------------+------------------+
| Severity | Characteristics | Investigation | Time Budget |
+----------+---------------------+------------------------------+------------------+
| P0 | Production down, | Mitigate first (P0 Protocol),| Mitigate: <15min |
| Critical | data loss, revenue | root cause after stable | Root cause: async|
| | impact, security | | |
+----------+---------------------+------------------------------+------------------+
| P1 | Feature broken, | Full 4-phase process, | 30-60min |
| High | blocking users, | no shortcuts | |
| | test suite failing | | |
+----------+---------------------+------------------------------+------------------+
| P2 | Minor bug, cosmetic | Phase 1 required; Phase 2 | 15-30min |
| Medium | edge case, non- | skippable if cause is | |
| | blocking | obvious; Phase 3 collapses | |
| | | to one hypothesis line | |
+----------+---------------------+------------------------------+------------------+
What ships with it
27 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/bad-good-debugging-reports.md 2.4 KB
- references/bug-type-strategies.md 8.0 KB
- references/condition-based-waiting-example.ts 4.9 KB runs code
- references/condition-based-waiting.md 3.8 KB
- references/debugging-report-scorecard.md 4.5 KB
- references/defense-in-depth.md 6.0 KB
- references/output-contract-template.md 5.7 KB
- references/root-cause-tracing.md 5.6 KB
- references/safety-and-authorization.md 7.5 KB
- references/scope-and-severity.md 6.9 KB
- scripts/find-polluter.sh 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/run_regression.sh 323 B runs code
- scripts/tests/COVERAGE.md 11 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/001_flaky_race_async_cache.json 512 B
- scripts/tests/golden/002_root_cause_trace_deep_stack.json 541 B
- scripts/tests/golden/003_perf_regression_profile_first.json 537 B
- scripts/tests/golden/004_multi_component_config_propagation.json 519 B
- scripts/tests/golden/005_dependency_break_no_code_change.json 564 B
- scripts/tests/golden/006_build_failure_generated_code.json 569 B
- scripts/tests/golden/007_p0_mitigate_then_investigate.json 530 B
- scripts/tests/golden/008_three_failed_fixes_question_architecture.json 590 B
- scripts/tests/golden/009_p0_blocked_no_repro_honest_report.json 669 B
- scripts/tests/golden/010_goroutine_leak_masked_as_latency.json 665 B
- scripts/tests/golden/011_timezone_locale_environment_drift.json 604 B
- scripts/tests/test_find_polluter.py 6.1 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_golden_scenarios.py 4.3 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_skill_contract.py 17 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 321 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e79c583c8f65
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository johnqtcg/awesome-skills (30 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 5,117 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
manage-skills
A maintenance workflow for checking whether project verification skills still cover the code and rules that changed during a session.
systematic-debugging
Structured debugging methodology — use before proposing fixes for any error or failure. Covers: code bugs, build errors, deploy failures, config conflicts, dependency issues, infra problems. Also use when previous fix attempts failed or root cause is unclear.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…
debugging-strategies
Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.
debug-helper
Diagnose and fix bugs systematically — error analysis, stack trace interpretation, root cause identification, and fix suggestions.
log-analyzer
Analyze application and infrastructure logs — pattern detection, error clustering, and anomaly identification.