Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add johnson7788/MultiUserClaw --skill osint-investigationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnson7788/MultiUserClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnson7788/multiuserclaw/osint-investigation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnson7788/multiuserclaw/osint-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnson7788/multiuserclaw/osint-investigation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnson7788/multiuserclaw/osint-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnson7788/multiuserclaw/osint-investigation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.02884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00577 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00288 |
Grade A, and why
osint-investigation scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- `fetch_*.py` scripts use `urllib.request` and respect `Retry-After`. Heavy This is a copy
94% identical to osint-investigation — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OSINT Investigation — Public Records Cross-Reference
Investigative framework for public-records OSINT: government contracts, corporate filings, lobbying, sanctions, offshore leaks, property records, court records, web archives, knowledge bases, and global news. Resolve entities across heterogeneous sources, build cross-links with explicit confidence, run statistical timing tests, and produce structured evidence chains.
Python stdlib only. Zero install. Works on Linux, macOS, Windows. Most sources work with no API key (OpenCorporates has an optional free token that raises rate limits).
Adapted from the MIT-licensed ShinMegamiBoson/OpenPlanter project; expanded to cover identity / property / litigation / archives / news sources that the original didn't address.
When to use this skill
Use when the user asks for:
- "follow the money" — government contracts, lobbying → legislation, sanctions
- corporate due diligence — who controls company X, where are they incorporated, who serves on their boards, what filings have they made
- sanctions screening — is entity X on OFAC SDN, ICIJ offshore leaks
- pay-to-play investigation — contractors with offshore ties, lobbying clients winning awards
- property ownership — find recorded deeds/mortgages by name or address (NYC; for other counties point users at the relevant recorder)
- litigation history — find federal + state court opinions and PACER dockets
- multi-source entity resolution where naming varies (LLC suffixes, abbreviations)
- evidence-chain construction with explicit confidence levels
- "what's been said about X" — international news (GDELT) + Wikipedia narrative + Wayback Machine to recover dead URLs
Do NOT use this skill for:
- general web research →
web_search/web_extract - domain/infrastructure OSINT →
domain-intelskill - academic literature →
arxivskill - social-media profile discovery →
sherlockskill (optional) - US federal campaign finance — FEC is intentionally NOT covered here (the API is unreliable for ad-hoc contributor-name queries on the free DEMO_KEY tier). For federal donations, point users at https://www.fec.gov/data/ directly.
What ships with it
28 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/sources/courtlistener.md 3.4 KB
- references/sources/gdelt.md 3.8 KB
- references/sources/icij-offshore.md 4.3 KB
- references/sources/nyc-acris.md 3.5 KB
- references/sources/ofac-sdn.md 3.5 KB
- references/sources/opencorporates.md 3.9 KB
- references/sources/sec-edgar.md 3.1 KB
- references/sources/senate-ld.md 3.3 KB
- references/sources/usaspending.md 3.8 KB
- references/sources/wayback.md 3.1 KB
- references/sources/wikipedia.md 4.1 KB
- scripts/_http.py 2.8 KB runs code
- scripts/_normalize.py 2.0 KB runs code
- scripts/build_findings.py 7.8 KB runs code
- scripts/entity_resolution.py 6.7 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_courtlistener.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_gdelt.py 5.3 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_icij_offshore.py 8.4 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_nyc_acris.py 6.4 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_ofac_sdn.py 5.4 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_opencorporates.py 6.6 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_sec_edgar.py 6.6 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_senate_ld.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_usaspending.py 5.4 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_wayback.py 4.4 KB runs code
- scripts/fetch_wikipedia.py 9.2 KB runs code
- scripts/timing_analysis.py 9.0 KB runs code
- templates/source-template.md 1.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 278 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A c75b5a30a197
osint-investigation is a skill published in the GitHub repository johnson7788/MultiUserClaw (318 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,884 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 94% identical to osint-investigation, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…