Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server/main/.agent/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jojeda96/mcp-analytics-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server/openspec-archive-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server/openspec-archive-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server/openspec-archive-change.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02374 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00475 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-archive-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to openspec-archive-change — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve the full path from each delta spec when resolving its main spec.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and ask the user to select one
When prompting, show only active changes (not already archived). Include the schema used for each change if available.
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g.,
/opsx-archive <other>).Load current archive inputs before the existing archive checks:
After resolving the selected change and planning root, run:
openspec instructions archive --change "<name>" --jsonKeep the same selected-root flags on this command. This lookup is advisory and optional: it only supplies extra prompt inputs, so it must never block archiving. If it exits non-zero or returns invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that does not support this command yet — continue the archive workflow with no context and no operation guidance. Do not report an error and do not stop.
A successful response may omit both optional fields. Treat
contextas a required prompt-level input: read and consider it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints. TreatoperationGuidanceas optional additive advice: read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in archive workflow.Keep both fields separate from built-in steps, explicit user choices, resolved paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one of those controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not follow it and explain why. Do not infer replacement paths, skipped prompts, or flags from either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, change artifacts, or archive summaries unless the user separately asks for it. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
Check artifact completion status
Run
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonto check artifact completion.Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being usedplanningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope contextartifacts: List of artifacts with their status (done,skipped, or other)
If any artifacts are neither
donenorskipped(skipped artifacts satisfy the requirement - the change declares skip_specs):- Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- Ask the user to confirm they want to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 183 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d7ac14b6dda5
openspec-archive-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jojeda96/mcp-analytics-server (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,374 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to openspec-archive-change, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-commit
Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.
gh-auth-isolation
Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.
comet-github
A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.
github-skill
Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
codex-autoresearch
Run autonomous, measurable experiments in a Git repository: change one hypothesis, verify a numeric metric, keep improvements, and revert failures. Use when the user wants Codex to keep iterating toward a numeric target in the foreground or as a detached background run. Do not use for ordinary one-shot coding…