Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jonathanmr22/pact --skill pact-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonathanmr22/pactWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00284 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00114 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
pact-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review the changes made in this session against PACT's cognitive redirections. For each question, evaluate honestly:
1. Dependency trace: For every file edited this session, what depends on it and what does it depend on? Were all downstream consumers updated?
2. Staleness audit: What did the changes make stale? Check:
- Architecture map (SYSTEM_MAP.yaml) — does it still reflect reality?
- Feature flow docs — do they still describe the correct behavior?
- Package knowledge files — any new packages used without research?
- Pending work tracker — updated with current status?
3. Cache consistency: If any provider/state management was modified, were ALL caches updated (both list and map caches)?
4. Package verification: Were any packages used based on assumption rather than verified documentation? Check knowledge/packages/ for knowledge files.
5. Lifecycle impact: Do the changes survive all app states? Fresh install, normal open, background, force close, backup restore?
Report findings as:
- PASS — checked and correct
- STALE — needs updating (specify what)
- UNCHECKED — couldn't verify (explain why)
- VIOLATION — cognitive redirection was not followed (specify which)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A bf6a03fded31
pact-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository jonathanmr22/pact (16 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 284 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
pact-check compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pact-checkjonathanmr22/pact | Skill | 16 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| test-auditQBall-Inc/the-bulwark | Skill | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewQBall-Inc/the-bulwark | Skill | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| spec-drift-checkQBall-Inc/the-bulwark | Skill | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-reviewertmj-90/gaffer | Skill | 2 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| card-reviewtmj-90/gaffer | Skill | 2 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 125 | Claude Code, Codex |
| review-tickettmj-90/gaffer | Skill | 2 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 143 | Claude Code, Codex |