Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jordanhindo/lore/lore-dev-verificationnpx skills add jordanhindo/lore --skill lore-dev-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jordanhindo/loreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jordanhindo/lore/lore-dev-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jordanhindo/lore/lore-dev-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jordanhindo/lore/lore-dev-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
lore-dev-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Lore Dev Verification
Use this before calling Lore work complete. Lore is memory infrastructure, so verification must prove behavior without leaking private transcripts.
Quick Start
- Classify the change with
references/verification-matrix.md. - Run the targeted checks for that row.
- For skill changes, run the bundle and test-report validators:
node skills/lore-dev-verification/scripts/validate-workflow-skill.mjs skills/<skill-name> - Run
npm run checkbefore merge unless the issue explicitly narrows the gate. - Record what ran in the issue or skill
evals/test-report.md.
Rules
- Current files, tests, and runtime artifacts beat old transcript memory.
- CLI and MCP surfaces must preserve JSON-envelope parity when they expose the same operation.
- Fixtures must be synthetic or scrubbed. Never commit real transcript excerpts, credentials, private project text, or personal memory.
- Real-store smoke checks are local proof only. Summarize counts/outcomes, not private message contents.
- A workflow skill is not done until
evals/test-report.mdcontains concrete eval evidence, validator output, trigger checks when relevant, privacy notes, and remaining risks.
References
references/verification-matrix.mdmaps change type to required checks.references/skill-review.mdexplains workflow-skill review and report gates.examples/contains example verification plans for common Lore changes.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/evals.json 2.0 KB
- evals/test-report.md 4.8 KB
- examples/adapter-store-change.md 323 B
- examples/privacy-destructive-memory-change.md 364 B
- examples/retrieval-change.md 427 B
- examples/skill-only-change.md 456 B
- references/skill-review.md 808 B
- references/verification-matrix.md 1.9 KB
- scripts/validate-workflow-skill.mjs 1.7 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 40 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 93c7ebfafaa6
lore-dev-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository jordanhindo/lore (13 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…