Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add joris887/exosuit --skill architecture-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joris887/exosuitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/architecture-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/architecture-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joris887/exosuit/architecture-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/architecture-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joris887/exosuit/architecture-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02021 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01010 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
architecture-check
You are a software architect validating that the codebase adheres to its documented architecture.
1. Load Architecture Documentation
Read:
docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md— documented module boundaries and dependenciesdocs/reference/GROUND_RULES.md— architectural ground rules with enforcement channels (if exists)docs/adr/— architecture decision records (if any exist)CLAUDE.md— architecture one-liner
If ARCHITECTURE.md doesn't exist or is a template, inform the user and suggest running /bootstrap or creating one.
2. Validate Module Boundaries
Apply the architectural_impact reasoning tool from .claude/skills/story-cycle/references/reasoning-tools.md to assess module boundaries systematically.
For each documented module/layer:
If the Module Map section contains explicit Dependency Rules (MUST/NEVER statements), use those as the primary validation criteria rather than inferring boundaries from the diagram alone.
Import Analysis
Scan imports to check for violations:
- No cross-layer imports — e.g., presentation layer should not import from data layer directly
- No circular dependencies — module A imports B which imports A
- Dependency direction — imports should flow in the documented direction (e.g., handlers → services → repositories, not reversed)
# Example: Find imports across boundaries
# grep -r "from data_layer" presentation_layer/
# grep -r "import.*handler" repository_layer/
Boundary Check
For each module:
- Does it only depend on modules it's allowed to depend on?
- Are there any "reaching across" imports that skip layers?
- Are shared types/interfaces in the right location?
3. Check for Architectural Drift
Compare the actual code structure against ARCHITECTURE.md:
- New modules — code directories not documented in ARCHITECTURE.md
- Missing modules — documented modules that don't exist (yet or anymore)
- Changed responsibilities — modules doing things outside their documented scope
- Undocumented dependencies — imports between modules not shown in the architecture
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 227 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 142a4a439f9a
architecture-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository joris887/exosuit (4 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,021 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-agents-skills
Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.
design-patterns
Detect, suggest, and evaluate GoF design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases. Use when refactoring code, applying singleton/factory/observer/strategy patterns, reviewing pattern quality, or finding stack-native alternatives for React, Angular, NestJS, and Vue.
pr-triage
4-phase PR backlog management with audit, deep code review, validated comments, and optional worktree setup. Use when triaging pull requests, catching up on pending code reviews, or managing a backlog of open PRs. Args: 'all' to review all, PR numbers to focus (e.g. '42 57'), 'en'/'fr' for language, no arg = audit…
eval-skills
Audit all skills in the current project for frontmatter completeness, effort level appropriateness, allowed-tools scoping, and content quality. Produces a scored report with effort-level recommendations for each skill. Use when onboarding to a new project, reviewing skill quality before shipping, or adding effort…
review-pr
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request.
sonarqube
Analyze SonarCloud quality issues for a specific PR.