Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JotJunior/cstk --skill go-review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JotJunior/cstkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02173 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
go-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Review PR
Perform a diff-aware quality review of ALL changes in the current branch before opening a PR. This is the final quality gate — it checks everything that go-review-service checks, but scoped to the diff only.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS should specify:
- Base branch (optional, default:
main) — the branch to compare against
Step 1: Gather the Diff
# Get the base branch (default: main)
BASE=${1:-main}
# All changed files in this branch vs base
git diff --name-only $BASE...HEAD
# Full diff for context
git diff $BASE...HEAD
# Commits in this branch
git log --oneline $BASE..HEAD
Categorize changed files:
- Go source files (*.go, excluding *_test.go)
- Go test files (*_test.go)
- Migration files (migrations/*.sql)
- Frontend files (*.ts, *.tsx)
- Config files (*.json, *.yaml, *.toml, go.mod, go.sum)
- Documentation (*.md)
Step 2: Per-Service Analysis
For each service with changed files, read the changed files and run these checks:
Check A: Compilation
cd services/{service} && go build ./...
Check B: Tests Pass
cd services/{service} && go test ./... -count=1 -timeout 60s
Check C: Lint
cd services/{service} && golangci-lint run ./... 2>&1 || true
Step 3: Convention Checks (on diff only)
For each changed Go file, verify:
3.1 Code in English
- All new variable names, function names, comments, error messages are in English
- FAIL if Portuguese found in code (excluding string literals for user-facing messages)
3.2 JSON Tags snake_case
- All new struct fields with
json:""tags use snake_case - FAIL if camelCase or PascalCase found in json tags
3.3 DB Tags Match Columns
- All new struct fields with
db:""tags use snake_case matching column names - Cross-reference with migration files if available
3.4 Schema Prefix in SQL
- All SQL queries in repository files use
{schema}.{table}format - FAIL if any bare table name found (e.g.,
FROM membersinstead ofFROM member.members)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 249 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A a55f5a18a4a3
go-review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository JotJunior/cstk (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,173 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-to-go-linter
Generate a new pkg/linters analyzer from a merged or open PR pattern.
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
sapcc-review
Gold-standard SAP CC Go code review: 10 parallel domain specialists.
go-concurrency-safety
L1 supplement - audits Go-specific concurrency hazards in node client code: map iteration non-determinism, goroutine leaks, mutex ordering, panic boundaries, context cancellation.
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…