Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JotJunior/cstk --skill go-review-servicegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JotJunior/cstkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-service)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-service"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-service/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-service"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jotjunior/cstk/go-review-service.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.03092 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01237 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00618 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00309 |
Grade A, and why
go-review-service scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Review Service
Perform a comprehensive read-only audit of a GOB Go microservice, checking 17 conventions. Outputs a structured PASS/FAIL/WARNING report with line references.
Trigger Phrases
"review service", "audit service", "validar servico", "check service", "verificar servico", "checar servico"
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS should specify:
- Service name (e.g.,
gob-member-service) — required - Focus area (optional) — e.g., "middleware", "routes", "repository" to narrow the audit
Pre-Flight
Determine the service root:
services/{service-name}/
Read these files first (in parallel where possible):
cmd/api/main.go— middleware order, wiring, shutdowninternal/factory/factory.go— repository factoryinternal/repository/repository.go— interfacesinternal/handler/*.go— route registrationgo.mod— module path, dependenciesmigrations/— list files for schema reference
Checks (17 total)
For each check, output one of:
- PASS — convention followed correctly
- FAIL — convention violated (include file:line reference and what's wrong)
- WARNING — partially followed or uncertain (include details)
- N/A — not applicable to this service
Check 1: Middleware Order in main.go
Expected order (top to bottom in main.go):
recover.New()requestid.New()apmfiber.Middleware(apmfiber.WithTracer(tracer))— after requestid, before logging (unconditional/nil-safe; rollout-window dual-accept detailed in Check 3)middleware.LoggingWithLogger(log)ormiddleware.Logging()cors.New(...)— with AllowOrigins, AllowHeaders, AllowMethods, AllowCredentialsmiddleware.DryRun(...)— if service supports dry-runmiddleware.DryRunFinalizer()— if dry-run presentmiddleware.AuditPublisher(...)— after cors/dryrun, before endpoints
Search: Look for app.Use( calls in main.go. Verify order matches.
Check 2: Audit Middleware
- Separate RabbitMQ connection (
rabbitmq.NewFromURL) - Uses
middleware.AuditExchangeconstant - Non-blocking: wrapped in
if rmqURL != ""with warning on failure - Placed AFTER cors and BEFORE health/ready/version endpoints
defer auditRMQ.Close()present
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 302 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 2c80d643f6e4
go-review-service is a skill published in the GitHub repository JotJunior/cstk (24 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 3,092 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
pr-to-go-linter
Generate a new pkg/linters analyzer from a merged or open PR pattern.
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
python-review-checklist
Deterministic Python review checklist shipped with the CAO skills-lifecycle example.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
ring:verifying-code
Verifying a Go project: runs every quality check (lint, vet, imports, format, docs, unit, integration, E2E) and returns a single MERGEREADY or NEEDSFIX verdict. Report-only: never fixes anything. Use for a quick pre-merge or pre-PR check outside a full dev-cycle. Skip when not a Go project, when you want a single…