Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin --skill pinescript-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpantsjoha/pinescript-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin/pinescript-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin/pinescript-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin/pinescript-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin/pinescript-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin/pinescript-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.02670 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.01068 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00534 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00267 |
Grade A, and why
pinescript-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +3 lines 972b49279de2
- 1mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 82264306ca9c
pinescript-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpantsjoha/pinescript-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), with no licence file. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 2,670 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
diagnose-backend-bug
Diagnose a bounded backend or multi-service failure from GitHub Issues, Jira, Aone, user-provided exports, logs, traces, responses, stack traces, or job records. Use when a service, API, RPC, worker, queue, CLI, or scheduled job bug needs correlation through the project's existing observability route before repair; do…
reproduce-frontend-bug
Build a bounded, replayable browser or UI bug reproduction from GitHub Issues, Jira, Aone, user-provided exports, screenshots, videos, comments, or attachments. Use for browser, WebView, IDE or desktop UI, interaction, responsive, rendering, accessibility, or visual defects that need evidence-preserving reproduction…
troubleshooting
Common ComfyUI errors and fixes. OOM, missing nodes, dtype mismatches, black images, and debugging strategies.
fix-issue
Fixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to…
error-analysis
Evals-first error analysis for LLM apps: clusters real Langfuse or JSONL traces into a human-confirmed failure taxonomy with counts, then recommends binary pass/fail evals for recurring named modes. Use to learn what to measure before writing evals. Not for CI failures.
ci-debug
Diagnose a failing CI run against an 11-pattern playbook. Classifies the failure, cites the relevant memory entry, proposes the exact fix command — but NEVER applies without explicit user approval. Use when a specific PR check or GitHub Actions run failed and you want a diagnosis instead of speculation. Don't use for…