Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel --skill complexity-guardrailsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel/complexity-guardrails)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel/complexity-guardrails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel/complexity-guardrails/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel/complexity-guardrails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel/complexity-guardrails.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00188 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
laravel:complexity-guardrails scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Complexity Guardrails
Design to keep complexity low from day one.
Targets
- Cyclomatic complexity per function ≤ 7 (start splitting at 5)
- Function length ≤ 80 lines (aim for ≤ 30)
- One responsibility per function; one axis of variation per module
Tactics
- Use early returns and guard clauses; avoid deep nesting
- Extract branch bodies into named helpers
- Replace long if/else/switch with tables (maps) or strategies
- Separate phases: parse → validate → normalize → act
Signs to refactor now
- Hard-to-test code paths
- Repeated conditionals with subtle differences
- Mixed concerns (IO, validation, transformation) in one method
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 29 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A edc432391290
laravel:complexity-guardrails is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpcaparas/superpowers-laravel (153 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 188 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.