implement

An end-to-end workflow for taking a queued development work item through planning, coding, review, and a pull request—the proposed code change submitted for merging.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when implementing one or more work items, including assessing scope, creating branches, planning from the item schema, running implementation and review, and creating a pull request.
Why use it?
It organizes the steps and checks needed to turn a backlog item into reviewed code, reducing the chance that planning, testing, or review is skipped.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement
Any agent
npx skills add jpicklyk/task-orchestrator --skill implement
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 11,734 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00101 $0.11734
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.05867
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.02347
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.01173

Measured 2d ago against content hash 144e5c69e31e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/implement/SKILL.md · 960 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 960 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implement

End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from queue to PR. This skill composes the schema-driven planning (spec-quality), implementation, review (review-quality), and git/PR workflow into a single pipeline.

Usage:

  • /implement <item-id> — work on a specific item
  • /implement — with context about what to work on
  • Can process single items or multiple items in batch

Step 1 — Assess the Work

Load the item(s) and determine the execution tier and interaction mode.

For each item, call get_context(itemId=...) to understand:

  • Current role and gate status
  • Schema tag (feature-implementation, bug-fix, etc.)
  • Existing notes already filled
  • Dependencies and blocked status

Execution tier — classify by this table (canonical source shared with the Workflow Orchestrator output style; edit the fragment, not this copy):

Criteria Tier Pipeline
1-2 files, known fix, no migration/new API Direct Orchestrator edits, tests, reviews inline
3-10 files, single logical unit, clear or explorable scope Delegated Single subagent, separate review agent
11+ files, multiple independent work streams, dependency edges Parallel Worktree agents, full pipeline

Force-UP signals (bump tier regardless of file count):

  • Database migration → min Delegated
  • New public API surface → min Delegated
  • Multiple independent work streams → Parallel
  • User says "let's plan" / collaborative language → min Delegated

Force-DOWN signals:

  • User says "just fix it" / "quick" → Direct (unless complexity contradicts)
  • Schema tag is default or absent → eligible for Direct

If the item has no schema tag, apply quick-fix for Direct tier or leave untagged for Delegated/Parallel (the default schema catches these).

Read the full file on GitHub · 960 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 960 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 144e5c69e31e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpicklyk/task-orchestrator (205 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 11,734 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.