Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jpicklyk/task-orchestrator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/main/.claude/skills/implement/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.18156 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.07262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.03631 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01816 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,251 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement
End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from queue to PR. This skill composes the schema-driven planning (spec-quality), implementation, review (review-quality), and git/PR workflow into a single pipeline.
Usage:
/implement <item-id>— work on a specific item/implement— with context about what to work on- Can process single items or multiple items in batch
Step 1 — Assess the Work
Load the item(s) and determine the execution tier and interaction mode.
For each item, call get_context(itemId=...) to understand:
- Current role and gate status
- Schema tag (feature-implementation, bug-fix, etc.)
- Existing notes already filled
- Dependencies and blocked status
When the user or an item references a PR or commit as already landed, verify its merge state
before relying on it — gh pr view <n> --json state,mergeCommit plus git log origin/main —
and confirm the working tree is current (Step 2, base-freshness precondition) before any pass
that checks whether a change is present in the codebase.
Execution tier — classify by this table (canonical source shared with the task-orchestrator:orchestrate skill; edit the fragment, not this copy):
| Criteria | Tier | Pipeline |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 files, known fix, no migration/new API | Direct | Orchestrator edits, tests, reviews inline |
| 3-10 files, single logical unit, clear or explorable scope | Delegated | Single subagent, separate review agent |
| 11+ files, multiple independent work streams, dependency edges | Parallel | Worktree agents, full pipeline |
Force-UP signals (bump tier regardless of file count):
- Database migration → min Delegated
- New public API surface → min Delegated
- Multiple independent work streams → Parallel
- User says "let's plan" / collaborative language → min Delegated
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +46 lines a4242eeb611a
- 2d ago Changed · +54 lines a0ccacb14c64
- 7d ago Changed 356aec51bb94
- 14d ago Changed 198ebb6142d1
- 19d ago Changed · +58 lines 76bbd3c8c9eb
- 22d ago Changed · +4 lines 186ae4394b8b
- 24d ago Changed · +12 lines 2e149a3fae5f
- 1mo ago Changed · +62 lines 503dcf467d18
- 1mo ago Changed · +55 lines 249e295098a5
- 1mo ago First seen · 960 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 144e5c69e31e
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpicklyk/task-orchestrator (209 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 18,156 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
branch-surgery-pr-split
Split oversized or mixed-concern branches into smaller, reviewable PR stacks with safety refs, topology selection, parity audits, and merge sequencing. Use when a PR or branch is too large, difficult to review, mixed across concerns, conflict-prone, or needs to be decomposed without losing net changes.
close-task
Close the task: update tracking and optionally its GitHub issue.
draft-issue
Draft a GitHub issue based on a discussion or requirements in the current conversation.
finish-task
Deprecated alias for close-task.
run-task
Run pending steps, then aftertask finalization; does not close the task.
omh-github-issue-intake
This is an OMH github-issue-intake workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).