Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forgenpx agentmods add skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/create-qa-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.02098 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00420 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00210 |
Grade A, and why
create-qa-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 301 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
create-qa-test
Category: Quality Assurance
Usage
create-qa-test <feature-name> [--url <url>] [--priority <priority>] [--explore]
Arguments
<feature-name>: Required - Name of the feature to test (kebab-case)--url: Optional - Test environment URL for the feature--priority: Optional - Test priority (critical, high, medium, low). Default: medium--explore: Optional - Launch qa-tester agent to explore the feature via Playwright
Execution Instructions for Claude Code
When this command is run, Claude Code should:
-
Generate Test ID
- Format:
QA-YYYYMMDD-###-feature-name.md - Use today's date
- Find next sequential number for today
- Format:
-
Create Directory Structure (if not exists)
qa-tests/ ├── draft/ ├── active/ ├── executed/ ├── archived/ └── screenshots/ -
Prompt for Details (if not provided)
- Feature description
- Test URL (if --url not specified)
- Acceptance criteria
- Prerequisites
- Test data requirements
-
Create QA Test File
- Place in
qa-tests/draft/with status DRAFT - Include all required metadata
- Generate test case placeholders based on feature
- Place in
-
Optional: Invoke qa-tester Agent
- If
--exploreflag is set, launch the qa-tester agent - Agent will navigate to URL and document test steps
- Agent will take screenshots of key states
- If
File Template
# QA Test Procedure: [Feature Name]
## Metadata
- **Test ID**: QA-YYYYMMDD-###
- **Feature**: [Feature name]
- **Application**: [App name]
- **URL**: [Test environment URL]
- **Created**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
- **Author**: [Name]
- **Status**: DRAFT
- **Priority**: [Critical|High|Medium|Low]
- **Estimated Time**: [X minutes]
- **PRD Reference**: [Link if applicable]
## Prerequisites
- [ ] [Required setup step 1]
- [ ] [Test account with appropriate permissions]
- [ ] [Test data prepared]
## Test Environment
- **URL**: [Test environment URL]
- **Browser**: Chrome (latest)
- **Credentials**: See password manager
---
## Test Cases
### TC-001: [Happy Path - Main Success Scenario]
**Objective**: Verify the main success flow for [feature]
**Preconditions**:
- User is logged in
- [Feature-specific preconditions]
#### Steps
| Step | Action | Expected Result | Pass/Fail | Notes |
|------|--------|-----------------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | Navigate to [URL] | [Page loads correctly] | ☐ | |
| 2 | [Action] | [Expected outcome] | ☐ | |
| 3 | [Action] | [Expected outcome] | ☐ | |
**Postconditions**: [Expected state after test]
---
### TC-002: [Validation Test]
**Objective**: Verify input validation for [feature]
| Step | Action | Expected Result | Pass/Fail | Notes |
|------|--------|-----------------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | [Submit with empty required field] | [Error message appears] | ☐ | |
| 2 | [Enter invalid format] | [Validation error shown] | ☐ | |
---
## Edge Cases & Error Scenarios
### EC-001: [Edge Case Description]
| Step | Action | Expected Result | Pass/Fail | Notes |
|------|--------|-----------------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | [Edge case action] | [Expected behavior] | ☐ | |
---
## Summary Checklist
### Critical Path
- [ ] TC-001: [Title]
### Validation
- [ ] TC-002: [Title]
### Edge Cases
- [ ] EC-001: [Title]
---
## Test Execution Log
| Date | Tester | Environment | Build | Result | Issues |
|------|--------|-------------|-------|--------|--------|
| | | | | | |
## Notes
- [Additional observations]
- [Known limitations]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 301 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 2025994d345e
create-qa-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,098 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
browse
Drive a real browser through Aside: open a page, read it, click through a flow, take screenshots, check console errors. (gstack).
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
create-verification-skill
Create a repo-local verification skill and exhaustive feature map for driving a real app through its UI, CLI, or API. Use for "create a verification skill", "make a verify skill for this repo", or "document how agents can verify this app".
browser-qa
A browser-based quality check for deployed web pages and user flows. It uses browser automation to test rendering, navigation, forms, interactions, responsive behaviour, and accessibility-related issues.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
test-electron-app
Drive the real running PostHog Electron app (live tRPC, workspace-server, real data) over CDP with agent-browser. Connect to the running app on port 9222, test desktop changes against a local Django stack, snapshot the accessibility tree, inspect network requests, and screenshot only when explicitly asked. Use when…