Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jpoutrin/product-forge --skill git-commitsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/git-commits)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/git-commits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/git-commits/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/git-commits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/git-commits.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00591 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
git-commits scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Commits Skill
This skill enforces git commit best practices and conventional commits format.
Conventional Commits Format
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
Commit Types
| Type | Description | Semver |
|---|---|---|
feat |
New feature | MINOR |
fix |
Bug fix | PATCH |
docs |
Documentation only | - |
style |
Formatting, no code change | - |
refactor |
Code restructuring | - |
perf |
Performance improvement | PATCH |
test |
Adding tests | - |
chore |
Maintenance tasks | - |
ci |
CI configuration | - |
build |
Build system changes | - |
Examples
Feature
feat(auth): add OAuth2 login support
Implement OAuth2 flow with Google and GitHub providers.
Includes token refresh and secure storage.
Closes #123
Bug Fix
fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint
The /users endpoint crashed when the database returned null.
Added proper null checking and error response.
Breaking Change
feat(api)!: change response format for /users endpoint
BREAKING CHANGE: Response now returns array instead of object.
Migration guide available in docs/migrations/v2.md
Atomic Commits
Each commit should:
- Represent ONE logical change
- Be independently revertible
- Pass all tests
- Be complete (not "WIP")
Bad Example
git commit -m "Fix bugs and add features and update docs"
Good Example
git commit -m "fix(auth): prevent session timeout on refresh"
git commit -m "feat(dashboard): add export to CSV button"
git commit -m "docs(api): update authentication examples"
Commit Message Rules
- Type is required and lowercase
- Description starts lowercase, no period
- Imperative mood: "add" not "added" or "adds"
- First line under 72 characters
- Body wraps at 72 characters
- Breaking changes marked with
!or footer
Claude Code Commit Footer
When committing with Claude Code, include:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A e79ed547eb69
git-commits is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 591 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.