typescript-code-review

typescript-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from jpoutrin/product-forge. It costs 31 tokens per session (2,745 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for React and TypeScript code, covering type safety, common React patterns, performance, and security issues. It includes checks for problems such as unsafe HTML insertion and exposing sensitive data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing React or TypeScript code for unsafe data handling, weak types, insecure code execution, problematic React patterns, and performance concerns.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers notice bugs and security risks that are easy to miss in frontend code. It also gives consistent standards for evaluating React and TypeScript changes.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the frontend-experts plugin — 2 skills, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it when reviewing React or TypeScript code for unsafe data handling, weak types, insecure code execution, problematic React patterns, and performance concerns.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jpoutrin/product-forge --skill typescript-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forge

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install frontend-experts, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for typescript-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for typescript-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,745 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.02745
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01098
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00549
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00275

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 459393f1ac1d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

typescript-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

const response = await fetch(url);
plugins/frontend-experts/skills/typescript-code-review/SKILL.md · 441 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 441 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

TypeScript/React Code Review Patterns

This skill provides TypeScript and React-specific code review guidelines. Use alongside typescript-style for comprehensive review.

Critical Security Issues

XSS Vulnerabilities

// VULNERABLE - dangerouslySetInnerHTML without sanitization
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: userInput }} />

// VULNERABLE - innerHTML assignment
element.innerHTML = userContent;

// SAFE - use DOMPurify
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput) }} />

// SAFER - avoid innerHTML entirely
<div>{userContent}</div>  // React auto-escapes

Insecure Data Exposure

// VULNERABLE - logging sensitive data
console.log("User data:", user);  // May include tokens, passwords
console.log("Request:", request.headers);  // Auth headers

// VULNERABLE - exposing in error messages
throw new Error(`Auth failed for ${credentials}`);

// SAFE - sanitize before logging
console.log("User ID:", user.id);  // Only necessary fields

Unsafe eval/Function Constructor

// VULNERABLE - code execution from strings
eval(userInput);
new Function(userInput)();
setTimeout(userInput, 1000);  // String argument

// SAFE - avoid string evaluation
setTimeout(() => { processInput(userInput); }, 1000);

Missing CSRF Protection

// VULNERABLE - no CSRF token
fetch('/api/delete', { method: 'POST', body: data });

// SAFE - include CSRF token
fetch('/api/delete', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'X-CSRF-Token': csrfToken },
  body: data,
});

High Priority Type Safety Issues

Unsafe Type Assertions

// DANGEROUS - bypasses type checking
const user = data as User;
const items = response as any[];

// SAFER - use type guards
function isUser(data: unknown): data is User {
  return typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'id' in data;
}

if (isUser(data)) {
  // data is now typed as User
}

Non-null Assertion Abuse

Read the full file on GitHub · 441 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 441 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 459393f1ac1d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

typescript-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

no-bare-casts

Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.

prisma/orm · 52 tokens

coding-standards

Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins · 28 tokens

plankton-code-quality

Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.

loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes · 34 tokens

best-practices

Language-specific best practices, code quality standards, and framework detection rules. Use when executing refactoring workflows, applying code quality rules, detecting frameworks, or checking language-specific patterns for TypeScript, Python, Go, Swift, or React.

FradSer/dotclaude · 52 tokens

code-review-typescript

Provides TypeScript-specific code review patterns covering strict mode, ESM, type safety, branded types, discriminated unions, async patterns, runtime safety, and common anti-patterns. Activates on detection of tsconfig.json, .ts, or .tsx files during code review — loaded automatically by dh:code-reviewer.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills · 70 tokens

architecture-audit

Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…

org2AI/ORG2 · 70 tokens