Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jpoutrin/product-forge --skill typescript-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02745 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
const response = await fetch(url); How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 441 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TypeScript/React Code Review Patterns
This skill provides TypeScript and React-specific code review guidelines. Use alongside typescript-style for comprehensive review.
Critical Security Issues
XSS Vulnerabilities
// VULNERABLE - dangerouslySetInnerHTML without sanitization
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: userInput }} />
// VULNERABLE - innerHTML assignment
element.innerHTML = userContent;
// SAFE - use DOMPurify
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput) }} />
// SAFER - avoid innerHTML entirely
<div>{userContent}</div> // React auto-escapes
Insecure Data Exposure
// VULNERABLE - logging sensitive data
console.log("User data:", user); // May include tokens, passwords
console.log("Request:", request.headers); // Auth headers
// VULNERABLE - exposing in error messages
throw new Error(`Auth failed for ${credentials}`);
// SAFE - sanitize before logging
console.log("User ID:", user.id); // Only necessary fields
Unsafe eval/Function Constructor
// VULNERABLE - code execution from strings
eval(userInput);
new Function(userInput)();
setTimeout(userInput, 1000); // String argument
// SAFE - avoid string evaluation
setTimeout(() => { processInput(userInput); }, 1000);
Missing CSRF Protection
// VULNERABLE - no CSRF token
fetch('/api/delete', { method: 'POST', body: data });
// SAFE - include CSRF token
fetch('/api/delete', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'X-CSRF-Token': csrfToken },
body: data,
});
High Priority Type Safety Issues
Unsafe Type Assertions
// DANGEROUS - bypasses type checking
const user = data as User;
const items = response as any[];
// SAFER - use type guards
function isUser(data: unknown): data is User {
return typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'id' in data;
}
if (isUser(data)) {
// data is now typed as User
}
Non-null Assertion Abuse
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 441 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 459393f1ac1d
typescript-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
no-bare-casts
Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.
coding-standards
Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.
plankton-code-quality
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
best-practices
Language-specific best practices, code quality standards, and framework detection rules. Use when executing refactoring workflows, applying code quality rules, detecting frameworks, or checking language-specific patterns for TypeScript, Python, Go, Swift, or React.
code-review-typescript
Provides TypeScript-specific code review patterns covering strict mode, ESM, type safety, branded types, discriminated unions, async patterns, runtime safety, and common anti-patterns. Activates on detection of tsconfig.json, .ts, or .tsx files during code review — loaded automatically by dh:code-reviewer.
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…