Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-stylenpx skills add jpoutrin/product-forge --skill typescript-stylegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-style)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpoutrin/product-forge/typescript-style.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00451 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00226 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TypeScript/JavaScript Style Best Practices Skill
This skill enforces TypeScript strict mode, ESLint standards, and modern patterns for frontend development.
Core Standards
- Strict TypeScript: All strict flags enabled
- ESLint: Type-checked rules enabled
- No
any: Useunknownor proper types - Explicit returns: All functions typed
Naming Conventions
// Types/Interfaces: PascalCase
interface UserProfile { }
// Functions/variables: camelCase
function calculateTotal() { }
const userName = "john";
// Booleans: is/has/can/should prefix
const isLoading = true;
const hasPermission = false;
Type Definitions
// Prefer union types over enums
type Status = "pending" | "active" | "completed";
// Use as const for constant objects
const HttpStatus = {
Ok: 200,
NotFound: 404,
} as const;
// Discriminated unions
type Result<T> =
| { success: true; data: T }
| { success: false; error: Error };
React Patterns
// Typed props
interface ButtonProps {
label: string;
onClick: () => void;
disabled?: boolean;
}
// Typed hooks
const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);
// Typed event handlers
const handleSubmit = (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => {};
Function Length Guidelines
- < 30 lines: Ideal
- 30-50 lines: Review for refactoring
- > 50 lines: Must be broken down
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Using
anytype - Missing return types
- Using
==instead of=== - Unhandled promises
- Magic numbers/strings
- Vague variable/function names
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 82 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 0d9d4c9d276c
typescript-style is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (15 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 451 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…