Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jsuvic/agent-profile --skill implement-nextgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jsuvic/agent-profileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jsuvic/agent-profile/implement-next)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jsuvic/agent-profile/implement-next"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jsuvic/agent-profile/implement-next/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jsuvic/agent-profile/implement-next"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jsuvic/agent-profile/implement-next.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
implement-next scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement Next
Purpose
Advance exactly one ready task from the TASKS.md ledger through a single implementation cycle, using its persisted issue brief as context. One invocation advances at most one task; it never iterates. Repeat the command for the next task.
Preconditions
TASKS.mdexists and is an index-only ledger whose rows link to issue briefs.- If
TASKS.mdis missing or contains noreadytask, stop and report the ledger state; do not invent work.
Flow
- Read
TASKS.mdand select the first task in stateready.- Stop at a
human-gatetask and explain the approval it needs; do not proceed past it. - Skip
blockedandsequencedtasks; they are not ready. - If no
readytask exists, stop and report.
- Stop at a
- Mark the selected task
in-progressinTASKS.mdthrough the client's write-approval flow. - Load the linked issue brief and run
subagent-driven-changewith the brief as Fresh Context. Its owner runscode-quality-reviewerbeforechange-risk-reviewer; initiate or resume the closed change-risk handoff and report its current state, but do not independently invoke another review, redefine budgets, or reset counters. - Mark the task
doneonly after the owner returns a validated terminalCLEANhandoff and required tests run green. Validate the closedChangeRiskOrchestrationStateV1record; its snapshot matches the current snapshot (modulodocs/review-learning/) and its terminal status isCLEAN. Do not infer completion from free-form prose or an unvalidated status. The next task requires a new invocation. - If the validated handoff reports
NO_PROGRESSorNEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW, report that outcome and its required escalation; do not mark the taskdoneor start another review. Keep the task out ofdoneuntil a human resolves the escalation.
Failure Path
Stop and report BLOCKED when any of these holds:
implementerreturnsBLOCKEDorNEEDS_CONTEXT,- a review finding cannot be resolved within the brief's scope,
- GREEN is unreachable within the brief's declared seam.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 0bcc35047cdb
implement-next is a skill published in the GitHub repository jsuvic/agent-profile (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fde
Keeps the engagement record for client work. Use when they name a client or stakeholder. Use when they debrief a meeting or paste notes. Use when they ask what was agreed. Use when they run a POC, change the client's codebase, prove it on their staging, go live, or need evals before a model acts. Use when they prep a…
ingest
Fetch requested source material and prepare sourced engagement updates. Use to catch up from external notes or messages; applying updates requires a bound record and confirmation.
audit
Audit an inherited engagement or implementation against its evidence. Use when taking over work or joining mid-project; distinguish verified facts from inherited claims.
board-memo
Draft a board or executive summary of an engagement using outcomes, risks and investment decisions. Use when the sponsor needs to brief senior leadership.
brief
Clarify a new customer brief, desired outcome, constraints and evidence gaps. Use for kickoff or a first meeting; do not repeat discovery already supplied.
business-case
Develop a business case for an initiative using costs, benefits, risks and evidence. Use when a sponsor needs budget or timeline justification.