Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jtprogru/bear-skills --skill vault-mermaidgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jtprogru/bear-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtprogru/bear-skills/vault-mermaid)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtprogru/bear-skills/vault-mermaid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtprogru/bear-skills/vault-mermaid/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtprogru/bear-skills/vault-mermaid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtprogru/bear-skills/vault-mermaid.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00405 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
vault-mermaid scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Mermaid-схемы
Обязательная init-строка
Каждая mermaid-схема в заметках должна начинаться со строки настройки useMaxWidth: true — это включает адаптивную ширину рендера в Obsidian (схема растягивается по ширине заметки и не обрезается).
Первая строка внутри блока mermaid всегда:
%%{init: {"flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": true}}}%%
Пример
```mermaid
%%{init: {"flowchart": {"useMaxWidth": true}}}%%
flowchart LR
A[Старт] --> B[Действие]
B --> C[Результат]
```
Правила
- Init-строка идёт первой строкой внутри блока, до объявления типа диаграммы (
flowchart,sequenceDiagramи т.п.) - Не оборачивай init в комментарии — это специальный синтаксис mermaid, а не комментарий
- Применяется ко всем типам диаграмм
- При рефакторинге/правке существующих mermaid-блоков без init-строки — добавляй её
Где применяется
Все скиллы и рабочие процессы, которые создают или редактируют mermaid-схемы в заметках:
obsidian-ingest— при визуализации концептовobsidian-split-note— при сохранении/переносе схем- Ручные правки заметок через ассистента
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 43 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7f55fe7c3c73
vault-mermaid is a skill published in the GitHub repository jtprogru/bear-skills (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 405 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
OCR Review-to-Approval Loop
Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the…
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions - requires technical verification rather than performative agreement or blind implementation.
code-review
A code-review skill that examines changes for requirement fit, correctness, security, maintainability, and performance. It reports findings with risk levels.
code-to-doc
A code-reading tool that turns a module's implementation into four current-state documents: architecture, API surface, data model, and code map. A monorepo is a repository containing multiple related projects, and the tool can account for that structure as well as other supported project layouts.
refactoring-and-tech-debt
Use when tracking tech debt across a codebase, when planning a refactor, when deciding whether to rewrite vs incrementally improve, when a workaround has appeared in three places, or when a refactor PR is about to be combined with feature work.