plan-review

plan-review is a skill for Claude Code from jtsang4/efficient-coding. It costs 14 tokens per session (53 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review session for questioning and checking an existing plan document. The description uses Chinese instructions and refers to a planning-coaching session.

In plain words
What is it for?
Critically reviewing a plan passed as an argument.
Why use it?
It helps expose weak points or unclear parts in a plan before work begins.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Good fit Critically reviewing a plan passed as an argument.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jtsang4/efficient-coding --skill plan-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jtsang4/efficient-coding

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for plan-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtsang4/efficient-coding/plan-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 53 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00053
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00021
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00011
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00005

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ed0fff794d52, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/plan-review/SKILL.md · 8 lines

What it actually says

运行一次 /plan-coaching 会话,使用审稿模式。目标文档:$ARGUMENTS

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 8 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A ed0fff794d52

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jtsang4/efficient-coding (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 53 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

plugin-creator

Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required .codex-plugin/plugin.json, optional plugin folders/files, valid manifest defaults, and personal-marketplace entries by default. Use when Codex needs to create a new personal plugin, add optional plugin structure, generate or update marketplace entries…

openinterpreter/openinterpreter · 86 tokens

cw-gates

Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.

Hmbown/Codewhale · 48 tokens

eval-dataset-design

A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.

bojieli/ai-agent-book · 138 tokens

memory-system

A guide to giving an AI agent persistent, user-specific memory across conversations. It covers what to remember, how to store it, how to update or compress it, and when to use memory instead of a shared knowledge base.

bojieli/ai-agent-book · 95 tokens

feishu

Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.

Hmbown/CodeWhale · 33 tokens

interview

Ask one useful structured question at a time only when material product/implementation choices are genuinely missing; remember answers and produce a brief/spec. Discoverable facts should be investigated instead of asked.

Hmbown/CodeWhale · 40 tokens