Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jtsternberg/claude-plugins --skill fix-findings-beads-tasksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jtsternberg/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsternberg/claude-plugins/fix-findings-beads-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsternberg/claude-plugins/fix-findings-beads-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtsternberg/claude-plugins/fix-findings-beads-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jtsternberg/claude-plugins/fix-findings-beads-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jtsternberg/claude-plugins/fix-findings-beads-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00432 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
fix-findings-beads-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Fix the issues/findings from this conversation, each tracked with a beads task and committed individually.
✅ DO ONE COMMIT PER FIX. ❌ DO NOT CREATE ONE BIG COMMIT.
$ARGUMENTS
Codex: if the invocation text above is not populated, use the text after the skill name. If none is available, infer the findings and optional --push flag from the current request.
Workflow
-
Load project conventions (if available): If the
CODE_CONVENTIONSenvironment variable is set and points to a readable file, read it before starting fixes. Each fix should respect these conventions to avoid introducing new violations while resolving existing ones. If unset, skip this step. -
Identify findings from the conversation. If ambiguous, confirm with user first.
-
Create one beads task per finding (
bd create), ordered by severity. -
Fix each finding individually — never batch:
bd update [id] --status=in_progress- Re-read files fresh (prior fixes may have changed them)
- Apply focused fix
- Lint changed files per applicable
AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md, and other repository instructions - Commit only files for THIS fix (no
git add .) bd close [id]- push to remote if specified with --push
- Move to next
-
Show summary when done:
# Finding Commit Beads Task
Rules
- One commit per fix. Never combine findings.
- If specified, push to remote after each commit. Never accumulate.
- Always re-read files before editing. Prior fixes may have changed them.
- If unclear, ask. Don't guess.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 46 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 2c4c0b6e5f02
fix-findings-beads-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository jtsternberg/claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 432 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-commit
Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.
gh-auth-isolation
Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.
comet-github
A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.
github-skill
Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.
changelog-composer
Generates structured changelogs and release notes from git history and PRs, classifying breaking changes, features, fixes, performance, docs. Triggers on: "generate changelog", "write release notes", "what changed since", "prepare release", "release notes for", "diff since tag".
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…