Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/commitnpx skills add juicesharp/rpiv-mono --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juicesharp/rpiv-monoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/commit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00065 | $0.01357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00678 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit Changes
You are tasked with creating git commits for repository changes.
Input
$ARGUMENTS — optional commit message hint, optionally with --baseline <path> (a workflow's run-start snapshot of paths that were already dirty before the run began). Peel the --baseline flag first; the remainder (if any) is the message hint. Empty/literal → infer from history and git diff.
Metadata
node "${SKILL_DIR}/../_shared/git-changes.mjs"
echo "---recent-subjects---"
git log --pretty=%s -n 20 2>/dev/null || true
---recent-subjects--- — up to 20 most recent commit subject lines, used in Step 2 to match the repository's existing commit-message style. Empty on a no-HEAD initial repo.
When --baseline <path> was provided, the Metadata block above was rendered WITHOUT the baseline (render-time substitution cannot capture $ARGUMENTS — same reason code-review's scope helper is LLM-invoked). Before anything else, re-run the snapshot with the baseline threaded and use ITS output as the authoritative ---status--- / ---diffstat--- for the rest of this skill:
node "${SKILL_DIR}/../_shared/git-changes.mjs" --baseline <path>
---pre-existing (do NOT commit — dirty before this run)--- — present in that re-run's output when some listed files were already dirty before the run began. These are out of scope: they are not this run's work. Never git add a path in this section — a workflow commits only the changes it produced. The re-run's ---status--- block already excludes them; they are shown purely so you know they exist and must be left uncommitted.
Context:
- In-session: If there's conversation history, use it to understand what was built/changed
- Standalone: If no context available, rely entirely on git state and file inspection
Process:
- Check git availability:
- If
in_repo:in the Metadata block isno, tell the user: "This directory is not a git repository. Rungit initto initialize one." Stop — do not proceed.
- If
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 93 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 4083dd4a00d9
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository juicesharp/rpiv-mono (736 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,357 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…