Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add juicesharp/rpiv-pi --skill revisegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juicesharp/rpiv-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/revise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/revise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
revise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Iterate Implementation Plan
You are tasked with updating existing implementation plans based on user feedback. You should be skeptical, thorough, and ensure changes are grounded in actual codebase reality.
Initial Response
When this command is invoked:
-
Parse the input to identify:
- Plan file path (e.g.,
thoughts/shared/plans/2025-10-16_09-00-00_feature.md) - Requested changes/feedback
- Plan file path (e.g.,
-
Handle different input scenarios:
If NO plan file provided:
I'll help you iterate on an existing implementation plan. Which plan would you like to update? Please provide the path to the plan file (e.g., `thoughts/shared/plans/2025-10-16_09-00-00_feature.md`). Tip: You can list recent plans with `ls -lt thoughts/shared/plans/ | head`Wait for user input, then re-check for feedback.
If plan file provided but NO feedback:
I've found the plan at [path]. What changes would you like to make? For example: - "Add a phase for migration handling" - "Update the success criteria to include performance tests" - "Adjust the scope to exclude feature X" - "Split Phase 2 into two separate phases"Wait for user input.
If BOTH plan file AND feedback provided:
- Proceed immediately to Step 1
- No preliminary questions needed
Process Steps
Step 1: Read and Understand Current Plan
-
Read the existing plan file COMPLETELY:
- Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters
- Understand the current structure, phases, and scope
- Note the success criteria and implementation approach
-
Understand the requested changes:
- Parse what the user wants to add/modify/remove
- Identify if changes require codebase research
- Determine scope of the update
Step 2: Research If Needed
Only spawn research tasks if the changes require new technical understanding.
If the user's feedback requires understanding new code patterns or validating assumptions:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 243 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A af3d73536a41
revise is a skill published in the GitHub repository juicesharp/rpiv-pi (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,969 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…