Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/julien777z/agent-sync-action/python-background-jobsnpx skills add julien777z/agent-sync-action --skill python-background-jobsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/julien777z/agent-sync-actionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/julien777z/agent-sync-action/python-background-jobs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/julien777z/agent-sync-action/python-background-jobs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/julien777z/agent-sync-action/python-background-jobs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01683 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
python-background-jobs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to python-background-jobs — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Background Jobs & Task Queues
Decouple long-running or unreliable work from request/response cycles. Return immediately to the user while background workers handle the heavy lifting asynchronously.
When to Use This Skill
- Processing tasks that take longer than a few seconds
- Sending emails, notifications, or webhooks
- Generating reports or exporting data
- Processing uploads or media transformations
- Integrating with unreliable external services
- Building event-driven architectures
Core Concepts
1. Task Queue Pattern
API accepts request, enqueues a job, returns immediately with a job ID. Workers process jobs asynchronously.
2. Idempotency
Tasks may be retried on failure. Design for safe re-execution.
3. Job State Machine
Jobs transition through states: pending → running → succeeded/failed.
4. At-Least-Once Delivery
Most queues guarantee at-least-once delivery. Your code must handle duplicates.
Quick Start
This skill uses Celery for examples, a widely adopted task queue. Alternatives like RQ, Dramatiq, and cloud-native solutions (AWS SQS, GCP Tasks) are equally valid choices.
from celery import Celery
app = Celery("tasks", broker="redis://localhost:6379")
@app.task
def send_email(to: str, subject: str, body: str) -> None:
# This runs in a background worker
email_client.send(to, subject, body)
# In your API handler
send_email.delay("[email protected]", "Welcome!", "Thanks for signing up")
Fundamental Patterns
Pattern 1: Return Job ID Immediately
For operations exceeding a few seconds, return a job ID and process asynchronously.
from uuid import uuid4
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
from datetime import datetime
class JobStatus(Enum):
PENDING = "pending"
RUNNING = "running"
SUCCEEDED = "succeeded"
FAILED = "failed"
@dataclass
class Job:
id: str
status: JobStatus
created_at: datetime
started_at: datetime | None = None
completed_at: datetime | None = None
result: dict | None = None
error: str | None = None
# API endpoint
async def start_export(request: ExportRequest) -> JobResponse:
"""Start export job and return job ID."""
job_id = str(uuid4())
# Persist job record
await jobs_repo.create(Job(
id=job_id,
status=JobStatus.PENDING,
created_at=datetime.utcnow(),
))
# Enqueue task for background processing
await task_queue.enqueue(
"export_data",
job_id=job_id,
params=request.model_dump(),
)
# Return immediately with job ID
return JobResponse(
job_id=job_id,
status="pending",
poll_url=f"/jobs/{job_id}",
)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 244 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 7ed75380c06e
python-background-jobs is a skill published in the GitHub repository julien777z/agent-sync-action (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,683 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to python-background-jobs, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…