oh-my-codex: Skill for Codex

.codex/skills/security-review/SKILL.md

security-review is a skill for Codex from junghwaYang/oh-my-codex. It costs 0 tokens per session (721 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist-based security audit for application code and system design, based partly on the OWASP Top 10, a common list of web security risks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before production releases, after adding login or permissions, when handling sensitive data, or for recurring security reviews.
Why use it?
It helps expose weaknesses such as missing access checks, unsafe input handling, leaked secrets, weak encryption, and insecure settings before deployment.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: installed under .codex/. Also seen: positional $N argument.

This is junghwaYang/oh-my-codex's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on oh-my-codex itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything oh-my-codex configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to junghwaYang/oh-my-codex. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codex/main/.codex/skills/security-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codex

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 721 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00721
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00288
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00144
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00072

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 53f378292c03, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.codex/skills/security-review/SKILL.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Review Skill

Focused security audit for code and architecture.

When to Use

  • Before deploying to production
  • After adding authentication/authorization
  • When handling sensitive data
  • Regular security audits
  • Compliance requirements

OWASP Top 10 Checklist

1. Broken Access Control

□ Authentication on all protected routes
□ Authorization checks for resources
□ No direct object references exposed
□ CORS properly configured
□ JWT validation complete

2. Cryptographic Failures

□ Sensitive data encrypted at rest
□ TLS for data in transit
□ Strong hashing for passwords (bcrypt, argon2)
□ No hardcoded secrets
□ Proper key management

3. Injection

□ Parameterized queries (no string concat)
□ Input validation
□ Output encoding
□ ORM used correctly
□ Command injection prevention

4. Insecure Design

□ Threat modeling done
□ Security requirements defined
□ Secure defaults
□ Defense in depth
□ Least privilege principle

5. Security Misconfiguration

□ Default credentials changed
□ Unnecessary features disabled
□ Error messages don't leak info
□ Security headers set
□ Dependencies up to date

6. Vulnerable Components

□ Dependencies scanned (npm audit, etc.)
□ Known vulnerabilities addressed
□ Components from trusted sources
□ Unused dependencies removed

7. Auth Failures

□ Strong password requirements
□ Rate limiting on auth endpoints
□ Session management secure
□ Multi-factor available
□ Secure password reset

8. Data Integrity Failures

□ Integrity verification for data
□ Signed updates/packages
□ CI/CD pipeline secured
□ Serialization safe

9. Logging Failures

□ Security events logged
□ Logs don't contain secrets
□ Log injection prevented
□ Monitoring/alerting set up

10. SSRF

□ URL validation
□ Allowlist for external calls
□ Network segmentation
□ Metadata endpoint blocked

Quick Checks

Secrets

# Look for hardcoded secrets
grep -r "password\|secret\|api_key\|token" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 53f378292c03

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository junghwaYang/oh-my-codex (5 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 721 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

security-review compared with skills from other repositories

security-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
security-reviewjunghwaYang/oh-my-codexSkill58mo agoMITA0Codex
imagegenopenai/codexSkill134ktodayApache-2.0A113Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwrightSkill99ktodayApache-2.0A19Claude Code
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersSkill79ktodayMITA200Claude Code, Codex
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowersSkill314k3d agoMITA21Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA95Claude Code
next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA103Claude Code