Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-Python --skill iterative-retrievalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-PythonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/iterative-retrieval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/iterative-retrieval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/iterative-retrieval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/iterative-retrieval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/iterative-retrieval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00614 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
iterative-retrieval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to iterative-retrieval — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Iterative Retrieval Pattern
Solves the "context problem" in multi-agent workflows where subagents don't know what context they need until they start working.
When to Activate
- Spawning subagents that need codebase context they cannot predict upfront
- Building multi-agent workflows where context is progressively refined
- Encountering "context too large" or "missing context" failures in agent tasks
- Designing RAG-like retrieval pipelines for code exploration
- Optimizing token usage in agent orchestration
The Problem
Subagents are spawned with limited context. They don't know:
- Which files contain relevant code
- What patterns exist in the codebase
- What terminology the project uses
Standard approaches fail:
- Send everything: Exceeds context limits
- Send nothing: Agent lacks critical information
- Guess what's needed: Often wrong
The Solution: Iterative Retrieval
A 4-phase loop that progressively refines context:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ DISPATCH │─────│ EVALUATE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ LOOP │─────│ REFINE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
│ Max 3 cycles, then proceed │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Phase 1: DISPATCH
Initial broad query to gather candidate files:
// Start with high-level intent
const initialQuery = {
patterns: ['src/**/*.ts', 'lib/**/*.ts'],
keywords: ['authentication', 'user', 'session'],
excludes: ['*.test.ts', '*.spec.ts']
};
// Dispatch to retrieval agent
const candidates = await retrieveFiles(initialQuery);
Phase 2: EVALUATE
Assess retrieved content for relevance:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 213 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A ee0055a7728c
iterative-retrieval is a skill published in the GitHub repository JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-Python (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,534 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to iterative-retrieval, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
graph-retrieval
Exposes graph-based retrieval as a tool capability via querygraph. Reads normalized graph store files, builds a query-relevant subgraph, and returns LLM-friendly semantic triples with replayable evidence metadata.
haiku-rag
Search, read and compute over the user's haiku.rag knowledge base through the haiku-rag MCP tools. Use whenever a request could be answered from the user's ingested documents, when asked to find, look up, check or cite something in their documents or knowledge base, or when the question is about the user's own…
opik-evaluate
Build an LLM evaluation and run it against the app, returning an Opik experiment with scores and its link. Picks a test suite with judge assertions or a dataset with metrics, sources cases from traces or synthetic data, scores heuristics-first then one-failure-mode judges, runs client-side via the SDK or server-side…
local-rag-search
Efficiently perform web searches using the mcp-local-rag server with semantic similarity ranking. Use this skill when you need to search the web for current information, research topics across multiple sources, or gather context from the internet without using external APIs. This skill teaches effective use of…
vector-backend-operations
Select and connect the right vector-store backend for the vector-mcp MCP server — chromadb, postgres/pgvector, qdrant, couchbase, or mongodb — and supply the correct dbtype/connection parameters that every collection and search call needs. Use when the agent must decide which engine to target, wire up…
vector-collection-management
Create, populate, list, and delete vector-store collections through the vector-mcp MCP server's vectorcollectionmanagement tool. Use when the agent must stand up a new RAG collection, ingest documents (from a directory, file paths/URLs, or raw text) into an existing collection, enumerate collections, or drop one …