Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Justdvp/claude-code-templates --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Justdvp/claude-code-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/justdvp/claude-code-templates/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justdvp/claude-code-templates/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justdvp/claude-code-templates/webapp-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justdvp/claude-code-templates/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justdvp/claude-code-templates/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to webapp-testing — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web Application Testing
To test local web applications, write native Python Playwright scripts.
Helper Scripts Available:
scripts/with_server.py- Manages server lifecycle (supports multiple servers)
Always run scripts with --help first to see usage. DO NOT read the source until you try running the script first and find that a customized solution is abslutely necessary. These scripts can be very large and thus pollute your context window. They exist to be called directly as black-box scripts rather than ingested into your context window.
Decision Tree: Choosing Your Approach
User task → Is it static HTML?
├─ Yes → Read HTML file directly to identify selectors
│ ├─ Success → Write Playwright script using selectors
│ └─ Fails/Incomplete → Treat as dynamic (below)
│
└─ No (dynamic webapp) → Is the server already running?
├─ No → Run: python scripts/with_server.py --help
│ Then use the helper + write simplified Playwright script
│
└─ Yes → Reconnaissance-then-action:
1. Navigate and wait for networkidle
2. Take screenshot or inspect DOM
3. Identify selectors from rendered state
4. Execute actions with discovered selectors
Example: Using with_server.py
To start a server, run --help first, then use the helper:
Single server:
python scripts/with_server.py --server "npm run dev" --port 5173 -- python your_automation.py
Multiple servers (e.g., backend + frontend):
python scripts/with_server.py \
--server "cd backend && python server.py" --port 3000 \
--server "cd frontend && npm run dev" --port 5173 \
-- python your_automation.py
To create an automation script, include only Playwright logic (servers are managed automatically):
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=True) # Always launch chromium in headless mode
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto('http://localhost:5173') # Server already running and ready
page.wait_for_load_state('networkidle') # CRITICAL: Wait for JS to execute
# ... your automation logic
browser.close()
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 51b7349e77ec
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Justdvp/claude-code-templates (7 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to webapp-testing, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-engineer
Automated E2E testing with Playwright including the auto-fix loop — generate test cases from the UI, run them, fix failures and re-run until passing, then produce a human-readable report. Test until it passes, not just test and report. Drives /toh-test; use whenever tests must be written, run, or made green.
browser-automation
Local Python-based browser automation toolkit using Playwright. Provides command-line tools for navigating, interacting with, and testing web applications without using MCP protocols. Supports clicking, typing, hovering, screenshots, content extraction, and JavaScript execution.
browser-automation
Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent.
build-verification-skill
Build this project's verification skill - a small CLI that drives the running app and captures evidence, plus a feature map of what exists and how to reach it - and the CI check that keeps the map current. Use when asked to 'build a verification skill', 'let the agent drive the app', 'make a feature map', 'the agent…
deckforge-visual-evidence
Start a DeckForge application in an isolated browser session, exercise editor/presenter/viewer/export capabilities, capture screenshots, console errors, failed requests, accessibility results, and traces, generate machine-readable evidence, and stop every process the run created. Use for visual QA of generated…
pw-playwright-fieldkit
Explore, debug, audit, compare, record, and test live websites with deterministic Playwright scripts and QE workflows. Use for requests to map a site, find broken pages or links, reproduce browser bugs, discover hidden or role-gated features, audit accessibility/performance, compare crawls, design or review test cases…