Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to justinz12xd/HACKATON-TAWS. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/justinz12xd/HACKATON-TAWS/main/.agents/skills/jelou-audit-workflows/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/justinz12xd/HACKATON-TAWSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/justinz12xd/hackaton-taws/jelou-audit-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justinz12xd/hackaton-taws/jelou-audit-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justinz12xd/hackaton-taws/jelou-audit-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justinz12xd/hackaton-taws/jelou-audit-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justinz12xd/hackaton-taws/jelou-audit-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.02921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01460 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00584 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
jelou-audit-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 334 B
- bin/lib/checks.js 32 KB runs code
- bin/lib/engine.js 12 KB runs code
- bin/lib/report.js 2.7 KB runs code
- bin/workflow-audit 50 B
- bin/workflow-audit.js 3.8 KB runs code
- CHANGELOG.md 406 B
- package.json 389 B
- README.md 479 B
- references/AUDIT_RULES.md 11 KB
- references/FINDING_WORDING.md 2.3 KB
- version.json 86 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 208 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A fd967d7a7f97
jelou-audit-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository justinz12xd/HACKATON-TAWS (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 2,921 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-code-review
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Report-only by default; apply fixes only when the current user or upstream caller explicitly requests review-and-fix. mode:agent is always report-only.
spec-compound-refresh
Refresh docs/solutions learnings against the current codebase. Use when auditing stale, overlapping, superseded, or drifted learnings; avoid general refactor, debugging, or code review unless docs/solutions is explicit.
spec-debug
Diagnosis loop for bugs and failing behavior. Use for errors, stack traces, regressions, failed tests, issue-tracker bugs, stuck investigations after failed fixes, or asks to debug/fix a bug.
spec-simplify-code
Simplify recently changed code for clarity, reuse, quality, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use for tidy/refactor passes; use spec-debug for bugs.
spec-explain
Create a durable, visual teaching artifact for a concept, diff, idea, or recent-work window, with an optional check-in that makes it stick. Use when the user asks to be taught or wants a deep explainer; not for ordinary Q&A, brief why-followups, diagnosis, status updates, or concise trade-off answers.
procurement-analysis
A procurement analysis workflow for breaking down purchasing needs, collecting data, analysing it, making charts, and writing a report. It covers supplier comparisons, price analysis, material selection, and procurement strategy reviews.