agentmods.dev

review-pr

review-pr is a skill for Claude Code from justnau1020/claude-os. It costs 38 tokens per session (395 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A pull-request reviewer for proposed code changes. A pull request is a set of changes submitted for review before they are merged into the main codebase.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a pull request’s description, changed files, and code diff, then review correctness, error handling, typing, test coverage, authorization, input validation, and exposed secrets.
Why use it?
It gives you a structured check for logic errors, project conventions, missing tests, and common security problems before merging.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: agent in frontmatter.

not rated 3repo 5mo ago A scan 38 tokens original Apache-2.0

Good fit Use it to inspect a pull request’s description, changed files, and code diff, then review correctness, error handling, typing, test coverage, authorization, input validation, and exposed secrets.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr
View source ↗ justnau1020/claude-os
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add justnau1020/claude-os --skill review-pr
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/justnau1020/claude-os

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-pr

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-pr

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/justnau1020/claude-os/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 395 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.00395
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00198
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00079
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00040

Measured 11d ago against content hash b962dc4b72c5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/code-quality/review-pr/SKILL.md · 53 lines

What it actually says

Review Pull Request

Review PR #$ARGUMENTS for correctness and convention compliance.

PR Context

  • PR diff: !gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not fetch PR diff"
  • PR description: !gh pr view $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not fetch PR"
  • Changed files: !gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS --name-only 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not list files"

Review Checklist

For each changed file, verify:

Correctness

  • Does the code do what the PR description claims?
  • Are there any logic errors or edge cases missed?
  • Are error paths handled properly?

Conventions

  • Are datetimes handled consistently (UTC internally)?
  • Are error messages specific and actionable?
  • Is async used properly (no sync I/O in async paths)?
  • Are type hints present on all new functions?
  • Are typed models used for data structures (not raw dicts)?

Tests

  • Are new features covered by tests?
  • Are edge cases tested?
  • Are external APIs mocked (no real network calls)?

Security

  • Are authorization checks enforced on new endpoints?
  • Are there any secrets or API keys in the diff?
  • Is input validation present?

Output

Provide a structured review:

  1. Summary: One-line assessment (approve/request changes)
  2. Issues: Specific problems with file paths and line numbers
  3. Suggestions: Optional improvements (clearly marked as non-blocking)
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 53 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b962dc4b72c5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository justnau1020/claude-os (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 395 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Claude CodeCode reviewagent-frameworkai-agentsclaude-skillsdeveloper-tools
Related

Other skills, from other repositories

resolve-pr-comments

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR…

tobihagemann/turbo · 95 tokens

review-code

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review…

tobihagemann/turbo · 144 tokens

assess-technical-debt

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical…

tobihagemann/turbo · 108 tokens

map-codebase

Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to "map…

tobihagemann/turbo · 106 tokens

peer-review

Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".

tobihagemann/turbo · 46 tokens

claude-print

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

tobihagemann/turbo · 59 tokens