Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jxoesneon/Ciel --skill quality-and-returnsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jxoesneon/CielWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jxoesneon/ciel/quality-and-returns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jxoesneon/ciel/quality-and-returns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jxoesneon/ciel/quality-and-returns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jxoesneon/ciel/quality-and-returns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jxoesneon/ciel/quality-and-returns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
quality-and-returns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
CIEL ADAPTATION: Quality & Returns (Integrity & Recovery)
This skill formalizes the lifecycle of non-conforming physical goods, from manufacturing defects to customer returns. It prioritizes safety, regulatory compliance, and margin recovery.
Non-Conformance Lifecycle (NCR/CAPA)
- Identify & Contain: Red-tag material immediately. Electronic hold in ERP.
- Investigate (RCA): Use 5-Why for simple issues; Ishikawa (6M) for complex process failures.
- Disposition (MRB): Use-as-is (requires justification), Rework, Repair, Scrap, or RTV.
- CAPA: Initiate for repeat failures or safety risks. Validate effectiveness (90-day monitoring).
Reverse Logistics (Returns)
- Grading:
- Grade A: Like New. Restock with full margin.
- Grade B: Minor cosmetic wear. Open-box/Refurb.
- Grade C/D: Heavy wear/Damage. Liquidate, parts-harvest, or destroy.
- Fraud Detection: Flag for review if return rate > 30% or serial number mismatch (+40 points).
- Vendor Recovery: Pursue RTV if (Credit * Probability) > (Labor + Shipping).
Decision Framework: "Human Error"
Human error is NEVER a root cause. The Orchestrator MUST ask: "Why did the system allow this error?" (e.g., Lack of poka-yoke, poor UI, fatigue).
Anti-Patterns
- Amnesiac CAPA: Closing a CAPA at implementation without a 90-day effectiveness verification.
- Vibes-Disposition: "Using-as-is" because of production pressure without engineering risk assessment.
- Invisible Returns: Letting RTV-eligible product sit in the warehouse past the vendor claim window.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 52 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 6d844eba80b0
quality-and-returns is a skill published in the GitHub repository jxoesneon/Ciel (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gumroad-support-refund-request
Handle buyer refund requests on Gumroad — standard, subscription, and duplicate-charge cases. Use when a ticket asks for money back, reports a double charge, or a seller is unresponsive to a refund. Decides eligibility, executes, and replies.
abandoned-cart-sms
Don't just say 'You forgot this.' This agent scrapes your product page to find the specific key benefit (e.g., 'Full Grain Leather') and uses it to write a persuasive, 3-part SMS recovery sequence automatically.
category-growth-trends
Don't buy based on last month's sales; buy based on next month's demand. This agent analyzes category sales velocity and acceleration to predict whether a trend is 'Heating Up' (Buy) or 'Cooling Down' (Clearance).
bundle-efficacy-tracker
Compares Average Order Value (AOV) and Margin of bundled vs a la carte orders.
free-shipping-threshold-tester
Simulates margin impact of moving free shipping thresholds based on current basket distributions.
holiday-shopper-reactivation
Segments users who only purchase during Q4 (Black Friday/Cyber Monday) for specific holiday warm-up campaigns.