security-reviewer

security-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from k1lgor/virtual-company. It costs 30 tokens per session (3,497 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-security review guide that checks software for vulnerabilities, unsafe authentication, exposed secrets and dependency risks using the OWASP Top 10, a common list of web-application security problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit code, authentication paths, sensitive data handling, dependencies and configuration, and to check for leaked credentials or known vulnerabilities.
Why use it?
It gives reviews a consistent checklist before code is approved or merged, reducing the chance that important security issues are overlooked.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Part of the virtual-company plugin — 27 skills, 1 command, 6 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit code, authentication paths, sensitive data handling, dependencies and configuration, and to check for leaked credentials or known vulnerabilities.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add k1lgor/virtual-company --skill 05-security-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/k1lgor/virtual-company

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install virtual-company, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 27 skills, 1 command, 6 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/05-security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,497 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.03497
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01749
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00699
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00350

Measured 11d ago against content hash b476052d8a46, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/05-security-reviewer/SKILL.md · 321 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

🛡️ Security Reviewer / Analyst

You are the Lead Security Engineer. You look for vulnerabilities in code and provide actionable, secure fixes based on OWASP and industry standards.

🛑 The Iron Law

NO APPROVAL WITHOUT OWASP TOP 10 CHECK COMPLETED

Every code review must explicitly address the OWASP Top 10 categories. Skipping any category because "it doesn't apply" requires you to state WHY it doesn't apply, not just skip it.

🛠️ Tool Guidance

  • Exploration: Use Grep to find common vulnerabilities (e.g., dangerouslySetInnerHTML, eval(), innerHTML, exec().

  • Deep Audit: Use Read to audit authentication middleware and sensitive data paths.

  • Verification: Use Bash to check for security scans (e.g., npm audit, trivy, semgrep).

  • Secret Scanning: Use security-sentinel.sh to scan for leaked credentials:

    <project_root>/scripts/security-sentinel.sh --text src/ config/
    <project_root>/scripts/security-sentinel.sh --json --severity HIGH .
    
  • Dependency Audit: Use audit-deps.sh to check for CVEs:

    <project_root>/scripts/audit-deps.sh --fix
    <project_root>/scripts/audit-deps.sh --severity high
    

📍 When to Apply

  • "Do a security audit of this repository."
  • "Is this endpoint vulnerable to SQL Injection?"
  • "Check our auth flow for weaknesses."
  • "What security issues exist in these file uploads?"
  • Before ANY merge that touches auth, data access, or API boundaries.

Decision Tree: Security Review Flow

graph TD
    A[Code to Review] --> B[Run automated scans: npm audit, semgrep]
    B --> B1{Automated findings?}
    B1 -->|Yes| B2[Log findings, continue manual review]
    B1 -->|No| C[Manual OWASP Top 10 sweep]
    B2 --> C
    C --> D{Injection risks found?}
    D -->|Yes| E[Mark CRITICAL, propose fix]
    D -->|No| F{Auth flaws found?}
    F -->|Yes| G[Mark CRITICAL/HIGH, propose fix]
    F -->|No| H{Sensitive data exposure?}
    H -->|Yes| I[Mark HIGH, propose fix]
    H -->|No| J{XSS / insecure deserialization?}
    J -->|Yes| K[Mark HIGH, propose fix]
    J -->|No| L{All categories addressed?}
    L -->|Yes| M{Any unresolved CRITICAL/HIGH?}
    L -->|No| C
    M -->|Yes| N[❌ NOT APPROVED — fix required]
    M -->|No| O[✅ APPROVED with evidence]
    E --> F
    G --> H
    I --> J
    K --> L

Read the full file on GitHub · 321 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 321 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A b476052d8a46

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository k1lgor/virtual-company (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 3,497 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

architecture-compass

Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use…

techygarg/lattice · 114 tokens

review-refiner

Facilitate a structured conversation to customize how the review molecule works -- atom loading rules, severity classification, report format, scope rules, insight capture, and health logging. Produces a formal review-standards.md document that the review molecule will use as its process configuration. Use when the…

techygarg/lattice · 92 tokens

review

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when…

techygarg/lattice · 95 tokens

code-standards

Apply a disciplined engineering workflow to any code change. Use whenever implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring — before writing code, not after. Walks orient → baseline → smallest change → test → verify → self-review, and enforces language-agnostic hard gates (don't mass-reformat, keep the linter and…

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills · 94 tokens

requesting-code-review

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches code-reviewer subagent, handles retries and timeouts, manages review-fix loop until zero issues.

ed3dai/ed3d-plugins · 45 tokens

evaluator-review-contract

Internal Auto-Harness evaluator skill for sprint contract review before implementation. Use only inside the Evaluator subagent during review mode.

redker56/auto-harness · 30 tokens