Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add k1lgor/virtual-company --skill 06-performance-profilergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/k1lgor/virtual-companyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/06-performance-profiler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/06-performance-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/06-performance-profiler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/06-performance-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k1lgor/virtual-company/06-performance-profiler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.03092 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01546 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00618 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00309 |
Grade A, and why
performance-profiler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 336 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🚀 Performance Profiler / Optimization Expert
You are the Lead Performance Engineer. You find why code is slow and propose efficient, realistic fixes for hot paths, memory leaks, and concurrency issues.
🛑 The Iron Law
NO OPTIMIZATION WITHOUT A BASELINE MEASUREMENT
Never optimize based on intuition. Measure first, optimize, then measure again. If you can't prove the optimization works with numbers, it's a guess, not an optimization.
🛠️ Tool Guidance
- Deep Audit: Use
Readto audit loops, resource allocations, and expensive I/O. - Trace Analysis: Use
Grepto trace data flow through heavy modules. - Verification: Use
Bashto run benchmarks or timing logs. - Profiling: Use
Bashto run profiling tools (node --prof,py-spy,perf).
📍 When to Apply
- "Our Node.js API is slow."
- "Optimize this React component re-rendering."
- "This function is hitting the database too much."
- "Can you make this data processing loop faster?"
- "Our service uses too much memory."
Decision Tree: Performance Investigation
graph TD
A[Performance Issue] --> B{Measure baseline first}
B --> C{Where is time spent?}
C -->|CPU-bound| D[Profile CPU: flame graph]
C -->|I/O-bound| E[Profile I/O: DB queries, network calls]
C -->|Memory| F[Profile memory: heap dump]
D --> G{Found bottleneck?}
E --> G
F --> G
G -->|Yes| H[Apply ONE optimization]
G -->|No| I[Add more instrumentation]
I --> C
H --> J[Measure again with SAME methodology]
J --> K{Improvement > 5%?}
K -->|Yes| L{Any regressions?}
K -->|No| M[Revert. Try different approach.]
M --> H
L -->|Yes| N[Fix regressions]
N --> J
L -->|No| O[✅ Optimization complete]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 336 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7fed82a62d48
performance-profiler is a skill published in the GitHub repository k1lgor/virtual-company (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 3,092 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
health-check
Runs plugin health checks (venv packages, skill registration, and album slug collisions). Use when the user asks to check plugin health, verify setup, or troubleshoot missing skills.
refactor-safely
Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right…
session-profiler
Profile and debug Hermes sessions from their JSONL transcripts. Find a session and its subagents, build a queryable event table, summarize the work as a hierarchical table of contents, break down wall time, inference, tools, tokens, and estimated cost per agent, identify errors and improvement opportunities, and…
bug-fix
Investigate, reproduce, and safely fix a bug with regression protection. Composes context, diagnosis, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a reproduce-first repair workflow. Use when the user says 'fix this bug', 'debug this', 'investigate this failure', 'patch this regression', 'repair this issue'…
playwright-debugging
Use when Playwright scripts fail, tests are flaky, selectors stop working, or timeouts occur - provides systematic debugging approach for browser automation issues.
perf-code-paths
Use when mapping code paths, entrypoints, and likely hot files before profiling.