CC Pocket is a mobile and desktop client for controlling Codex and Claude coding-agent sessions through a self-hosted Bridge Server running on another computer. It lets users start sessions, approve actions, answer questions, review changes, and continue coding from supported devices. The catalogue entries provide the skills, hooks, MCP servers, agents, instructions, and settings used by this client.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to K9i-0/ccpocket. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K9i-0/ccpocket/main/.claude/skills/test-flutter/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/K9i-0/ccpocketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/k9i-0/ccpocket/test-flutter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k9i-0/ccpocket/test-flutter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k9i-0/ccpocket/test-flutter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k9i-0/ccpocket/test-flutter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k9i-0/ccpocket/test-flutter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
test-flutter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Flutter App テスト
実行手順
変更した挙動に対応するテストと静的検証を選ぶ。全体テストは、共通基盤・依存関係への変更や回帰懸念がある場合、または全体検証を依頼された場合に実行する。成功済みの検証を理由なく繰り返さない。以下はコマンドの選択肢。
1. 静的解析
dart analyze apps/mobile
今回の変更で生じた warning 以上は修正する。既存の無関係な問題は報告し、info は必要に応じて対応する。
MCP代替: mcp__dart-mcp__analyze_files でも実行可能だが、CLI推奨。
2. フォーマット
dart format <変更したDartファイル>
3. ユニットテスト
cd apps/mobile && flutter test
特定ファイルのみ:
cd apps/mobile && flutter test test/<filename>_test.dart
MCP代替: mcp__dart-mcp__run_tests でも実行可能だが、CLI推奨。
MCP版はDTD接続不要な操作のため、CLIの方が効率的。
テスト記述規約
ファイル配置・命名
- テストファイルは
apps/mobile/test/に配置 - 命名:
<対象の概念>_test.dart- ウィジェットテスト例:
approval_bar_test.dart,chat_input_bar_test.dart - ロジックテスト例:
chat_message_handler_test.dart
- ウィジェットテスト例:
import
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:ccpocket/...';
テスト構造
void main() {
group('対象クラスまたは機能', () {
test('動作の説明', () {
// ロジックテスト
expect(actual, expected);
});
testWidgets('UI動作の説明', (tester) async {
// ウィジェットテスト
await tester.pumpWidget(MaterialApp(home: TargetWidget()));
expect(find.text('expected'), findsOneWidget);
});
});
}
groupで対象機能ごとにグルーピング- ロジックテストは
test()、UI テストはtestWidgets()を使い分ける setUp()でテスト前の共通初期化を行う
テスト対象の方針
- ウィジェットテスト: 画面の表示・インタラクション検証
pumpWidgetでウィジェット構築 →findで要素確認 →tap/enterTextで操作
- ロジックテスト: サービス・ハンドラーの振る舞い検証
- 純粋なDartクラスのメソッド呼び出しと結果確認
- WebSocket通信やBridge接続のモックが必要なテストは避ける (E2E領域)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines 539c14f72e37
- 1mo ago Changed · -14 lines 2016e32fd58e
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 78715fdc3bf7
test-flutter is a skill published in the GitHub repository K9i-0/ccpocket (1,092 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
noqa-testing
Use this skill when the user wants to boot and interact with iOS or Android devices/simulators — inspect the screen, execute actions, generate or edit test cases, or run UI tests via the noqa platform.
mobiloop-mobile-qa
Test mobile apps with MobiLoop MCP, collect device evidence, and fix and retest confirmed failures within the user's scope. Use for Flutter, React Native, Android, or iOS QA on an emulator, simulator, or device, including relevant mobile security checks.
ios-testing
Testing patterns for Swift and SwiftUI apps.
mobile-testing
Android and JVM testing - JUnit5, MockK, Turbine for Flow, and Compose UI testing for unit, integration, and UI tests; also applies to KMP commonTest running on the JVM/Android target. For iOS/Swift tests (XCTest, Swift Testing, XCUITest) use ios-testing. For TDD methodology and the three-tier test model (fake-first…
zmr-mobile-testing
Use when testing mobile apps with Zeno Mobile Runner, integrating app-local .zmr setup, driving Android or iOS simulator scenarios, using JSON-RPC or MCP agent sessions, exporting traces, or comparing mobile runner benchmarks.
android-e2e-readiness
Use when Android mobile E2E flows are flaky, Compose and View screens disagree with automation, hybrid screens are ambiguous, retries hide the real issue, or the team keeps collapsing the problem to selector-vs-timing without checking Android-specific readiness contracts.