Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kacper0199/Opencode-Ultrathinker --skill agent-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kacper0199/Opencode-UltrathinkerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kacper0199/opencode-ultrathinker/agent-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kacper0199/opencode-ultrathinker/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kacper0199/opencode-ultrathinker/agent-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 103 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 96e0b077dd7d
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kacper0199/Opencode-Ultrathinker (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ap-juror
L4 terminal leaf - G7 SIGN-OFF. One independent sign-off panel seat that saw none of the intermediate work. Binary PASS/FAIL on opened evidence; default-FAIL. A FAIL naming a P0/P1 blocker is NOT arbitrable into PASS.
ap-reviewer
L3 independent G2/G5 or roadmap reviewer - checks mission coverage, reality, tests, boundaries, and claim-vs-diff; returns binary SMASH or PASS.
ap-sweeper
L3 executor - SWEEP. Fresh production-readiness sweeper that re-derives mission coverage, inspects the changed neighborhood, checks GATELOG provenance, and returns evidence-backed P0..P3 findings.
slipway-review
Inspect intent and quality once and report findings without modifying code or creating a repair loop.
aidex-review
Use when the user wants code reviewed as it stands — a module, a feature, a path, or the whole app — rather than a diff or a pull request. Covers correctness/bug hunting, simplification and dead code, exploitable security defects, and performance waste, and it first proposes which finder agents are worth launching and…
aidex-audit
Use when the user wants to assess the state of a feature, flow, or module — a UX, security, performance, or accessibility audit; cataloging bugs, gaps, and opportunities; retesting open findings; escalating a finding to the backlog; or updating audit methodology. Fires on "I want to do a UX / security / performance /…