Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kaeawc/auto-mobile --skill push-my-prsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kaeawc/auto-mobileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaeawc/auto-mobile/push-my-prs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaeawc/auto-mobile/push-my-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kaeawc/auto-mobile/push-my-prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaeawc/auto-mobile/push-my-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kaeawc/auto-mobile/push-my-prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
push-my-prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Push My PRs
Iterate through your open PRs in the current repo and keep them moving.
- Prefer
push-prwhen the task is about the current branch or a single PR. - Prefer
push-my-prsonly for batch PR maintenance.
Workflow
- Get the current GitHub user with
gh api user -q .login. - List open PRs for that author with
gh pr list --author "$GH_USER" --state open. - For each PR, gather CI status, mergeability, review verdicts, unresolved threads, and top-level comments.
- Check out the PR branch, pull the latest changes, and address actionable feedback.
- Reproduce CI failures locally with the lightest relevant validation.
- Resolve review threads only when the underlying issue is actually addressed.
- Commit and push only when there are real changes.
- Re-enable automerge if appropriate.
Repo Rules
- Use
github-cli,push-pr,check-ci, andvalidateconventions. - Prefer repo validations and scripts over ad hoc commands.
- Never force push unless a rebase made it necessary, and then use
--force-with-leaseonly. - Leave ambiguous comments unresolved and note them in the summary.
- Write logs or thread snapshots you need to keep under
scratch/.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 31 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 7251b286b4bc
push-my-prs is a skill published in the GitHub repository kaeawc/auto-mobile (46 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.