Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill --skill dare-to-followgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/dare-to-follow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/dare-to-follow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/dare-to-follow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/dare-to-follow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/dare-to-follow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.02092 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00069 | $0.01046 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
dare-to-follow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
"敢为天下后"后发制人策略
R — 原文 (Reading)
"没有差异化的'敢为天下后'是无法生存的。所谓差异化指的就是客户需要但别人未能满足的东西。"
— 段永平, 第4节
"敢为天下后,前提是你能够提供用户需要而别人没有的东西。微软没有什么东西是先做的。"
— 段永平, 第4节
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
这是一个市场进入策略框架,核心思想是:不追求先发优势,等市场验证后再进入,但必须带差异化。
前提条件(缺一不可):
- 市场已被验证(有人做成了,证明需求存在)
- 自己能提供差异化(用户需要但现有产品没有的)
- 有足够的资源集中投入
为什么后发更好:
- 培育市场的代价由先行者承担——小企业付不起这个学费
- 看清市场后做SWOT分析更可靠,减少了不确定性
- 进入时机选在产品成长期与成熟期之间——需求确认但格局未定
关键区分:
- "敢为天下后" ≠ 消极等待 → 而是看清后精准出击
- "敢为天下后" ≠ 简单模仿 → 必须有差异化的创新
- 后发的核心是"后中争先"——进入后做到最好
适用边界:
- 适合:已有成熟模式但差异化空间大的市场
- 不适合:真正全新的蓝海(没有可参考的模式)
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 步步高进入VCD市场
- 问题: VCD市场已有万燕等先行者,步步高要不要做?
- 方法论的使用: 市场已被验证(VCD需求确实存在),步步高能提供差异化(更好的品质和品牌),后发进入
- 结论: 等市场成型后切入
- 结果: 步步高成为VCD市场领导者,而先行者万燕因培育市场代价过大而失败
案例 2: OPPO/vivo进入手机市场
- 问题: 手机市场已有诺基亚、摩托罗拉等巨头
- 方法论的使用: 市场巨大且已有验证,步步高能提供差异化(更好的渠道、更了解中国消费者、聚焦线下)
- 结论: 后发进入,但集中兵力做差异化
- 结果: OPPO/vivo成为全球前五手机品牌
案例 3: 微软——后发制人的标杆
- 问题: 微软为什么总是在别人后面却总是赢?
- 方法论的使用: "微软没有什么东西是先做的"——操作系统(IBM先做)、浏览器(网景先做)、Office(各种先做者),但微软每次后发都带了差异化和资源优势
- 结论: 后发不是问题,有没有差异化才是
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户想进入一个已有竞争者的市场,担心"太晚了"
- 用户在纠结是先发(培育市场)还是后发(等市场成熟)
- 用户是小企业,资源有限,不知道该进攻哪个市场
- 用户在分析"为什么有些后发者赢了先行者"
- 用户在评估某个市场的进入时机
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "这个市场已经有人做了,还值得进入吗"
- "我们应该先发还是等一等"
- "小企业怎么和大企业竞争"
- "太晚了吗" / "还有机会吗"
- "红海里怎么活" / "怎么后来居上"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
business-model-evaluator的区别: business-model-evaluator 评估已有生意的模式好坏,本 skill 决定要不要进入一个新市场——是决策工具不是评估工具 - 与
stop-doing-list的区别: stop-doing-list 说"不做没差异化的产品",本 skill 说"只有有差异化才能后发进入"——是正反两面
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
-
市场验证检查
- 完成标准: 确认市场已有成功案例(至少1-2家公司在赚钱),需求被验证
- 判停条件: 如果市场完全没人做过、需求未验证 → 不适用本策略,需要另外评估
-
差异化能力评估
- 完成标准: 列出你能提供的、现有玩家无法满足的用户需求(至少1个核心差异化点)
- 判停条件: 如果找不到差异化 → "没有差异化的敢为天下后就变成悲剧" → 不进入
-
资源和时机评估
- 完成标准: 确认自己有足够资源集中投入这一个市场;判断市场处于成长期还是成熟期
- 最佳进入时机:成长期中后期(需求确认+格局未定)
-
集中兵力,后中争先
- 完成标准: 制定"进入后做到最好"的执行计划——聚焦一个差异化点做到极致
- 关键: 不是"试试看",而是"全力以赴"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 157 lines · 139 tokens per session scan A f8e67d7f9182
dare-to-follow is a skill published in the GitHub repository kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill (48 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 2,092 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cangjie-skill
A process for turning a book, course, podcast, interview, long video, or other long material into reusable instructions for an AI agent. It extracts methods and principles, checks them, and packages them as skills.
naval-almanack
A reference guide for applying ideas from The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book about wealth, work, happiness, judgment, and long-term thinking. It routes questions to the relevant topic guidance and notes when professional help is needed.
decision-heuristics
A set of heuristics for making difficult personal decisions such as changing jobs, buying a home, moving, forming a partnership, or getting married. It is intended for major choices, not everyday decisions.
hourly-rate-time
A time-management method based on assigning a high personal value to each hour. It treats time as a limited resource and uses that value to decide which tasks to do, outsource, or skip.
productize-yourself
A Chinese-language coaching framework for finding a distinctive career, side business, or freelance direction. It combines personal strengths that are hard to teach with ways to turn them into repeatable products or content.
screen-detox
A habit-change framework for reducing non-work screen use such as social media, short videos, games, and endless scrolling.