Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill --skill profit-above-pursuitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/profit-above-pursuit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/profit-above-pursuit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/profit-above-pursuit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/profit-above-pursuit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill/profit-above-pursuit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.02190 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01095 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
profit-above-pursuit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
"利润之上的追求"企业诊断
R — 原文 (Reading)
"利润之上的追求指的是把消费者需求放在公司短期利益前面。多数公司碰到问题时讨论的都是有没有钱赚的问题，而有利润之上追求的公司碰到问题时可能会先问一句，这是对的事情吗？这是应该赚的钱吗？其实差别很小，但20年后差别很大。"
— 段永平, 第1节
"所谓'好公司'我觉得应该是有原则的公司，不是单纯利润导向的公司。"
— 段永平, 第1节
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
"利润之上的追求"是一个用来诊断企业根本驱动力的工具。
核心诊断信号：面对商业决策时，公司先问什么？
- 先问"赚不赚钱" → 利润导向 → 短期可能成功但长期容易被诱惑带偏
- 先问"这对不对""这是该赚的钱吗" → 利润之上追求 → 长期更可能成为伟大公司
关键理解：
- 这不是慈善——利润之上的追求反而带来更多利润（"利润不过是水到渠成的结果"）
- 这不是充分条件——有追求不一定是好企业，但"时间越长差别越大"
- 这是一个过滤器——不是精确评分，而是"有或没有"的二元判断
具体表现：
- 有利润之上追求的公司：碰到问题先问"这是对的事情吗"
- 苹果为盲人做无障碍功能不计ROI——这就是利润之上的追求
- 动力来自产品而不是利润——"这种差别很微妙，但它会影响每一件事：你聘用谁、提拔谁、会议上讨论什么事情"
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 苹果——利润之上追求的极致
- 问题: 为什么苹果是伟大公司？
- 方法论的使用: 乔布斯说"动力来自产品而不是利润"——苹果做无障碍功能不计ROI，做环保不计短期收益
- 结论: 苹果有利润之上的追求 → 成为伟大公司
- 结果: 苹果成为全球市值最高公司之一
案例 2: 索尼——失去利润之上追求的后果
- 问题: 索尼为什么从伟大变平庸？
- 方法论的使用: 索尼从产品导向变成利润导向——质量下降（不合格的DVD机芯、明知有问题的跳舞毯）
- 结论: 当"有没有钱赚"盖过了"这对不对"，衰败就开始了
- 结果: 索尼从行业标杆变成普通公司
案例 3: 步步高——利润之上追求在日常中的体现
- 问题: 步步高的"三不赚原则"怎么来的？
- 方法论的使用: 违法的钱不赚、有违道德的钱不赚、超过自己能力的钱不赚——每一条都是在问"这对不对"而非"赚不赚"
- 结论: 这就是利润之上追求的操作化
- 结果: 步步高体系下的公司（OPPO/vivo）都长期健康发展
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户在分析一家公司为什么能长期成功或为什么突然衰败
- 用户在自己公司面临"赚钱但不那么对"的决策
- 用户在评估是否投资/加入一家公司，想判断其根本驱动力
- 用户在思考"企业应该以什么为第一目标"
- 用户在讨论企业文化/价值观的重要性
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "为什么XX公司能基业长青"
- "利润和理想怎么选"
- "公司应该追求什么"
- "为什么有的公司短期好长期不行"
- "企业文化为什么重要"
- "怎么判断一家公司是不是真的为用户着想"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
culture-judger的区别: culture-judger 是全面的文化诊断（四维度），本 skill 聚焦一个具体的诊断信号（先问对不对还是先问赚不赚）——更精准但更窄 - 与
right-things-first的区别: right-things-first 是通用的方向判断框架，本 skill 是其在商业价值观层面的具体应用——"做对的事情"在商业中体现为"利润之上"
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
-
收集决策案例
- 完成标准: 找到该公司3-5个重大商业决策，看每个决策的讨论过程和最终理由
- 关键信号: 决策时先讨论什么——"能不能赚钱"还是"这是对的事情吗"
-
诊断驱动力
- 完成标准: 判断该公司是"利润导向"还是"利润之上追求"
- 注意: 不是看宣传说什么，而是看面对利益冲突时实际怎么选
-
时间放大器评估
- 完成标准: 想象10-20年后——如果保持现有驱动力，这家公司会怎样？
- 段永平的洞见: "差别很小，但20年后差别很大"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 151 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A b4ae1af83a8b
profit-above-pursuit is a skill published in the GitHub repository kangarooking/duan-yongping-skill (48 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,190 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cangjie-skill
A process for turning a book, course, podcast, interview, long video, or other long material into reusable instructions for an AI agent. It extracts methods and principles, checks them, and packages them as skills.
naval-almanack
A reference guide for applying ideas from The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book about wealth, work, happiness, judgment, and long-term thinking. It routes questions to the relevant topic guidance and notes when professional help is needed.
decision-heuristics
A set of heuristics for making difficult personal decisions such as changing jobs, buying a home, moving, forming a partnership, or getting married. It is intended for major choices, not everyday decisions.
hourly-rate-time
A time-management method based on assigning a high personal value to each hour. It treats time as a limited resource and uses that value to decide which tasks to do, outsource, or skip.
productize-yourself
A Chinese-language coaching framework for finding a distinctive career, side business, or freelance direction. It combines personal strengths that are hard to teach with ways to turn them into repeatable products or content.
screen-detox
A habit-change framework for reducing non-work screen use such as social media, short videos, games, and endless scrolling.