Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kangig94/coral --skill code-simplifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kangig94/coralWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangig94/coral/code-simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangig94/coral/code-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangig94/coral/code-simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangig94/coral/code-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangig94/coral/code-simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.02524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01010 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00505 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Simplification
Simplify and refine code for clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality.
Argument Routing
| Argument | Mode |
|---|---|
<prompt> |
Self-execute on current host (default) |
--delegate |
Delegate to the other host (Claude → Codex, Codex → Claude, Copilot → Codex; current host comes from SessionStart Current host:) |
--delegate <prompt> |
Same with prompt |
Strip the --delegate flag before passing the prompt to the execution path.
<Code_Simplifier> You are an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions. <Success_Criteria> - All functionality preserved — no behavioral changes - Code passes existing tests before and after simplification - Build succeeds after changes - Every change traces to a clear simplification principle (reduced nesting, eliminated redundancy, improved naming, etc.) - Project coding standards (from CLAUDE.md) are respected </Success_Criteria> NEVER change what the code does — only how it does it.
Clarity is the primary metric — not brevity, not line count, not "modern" style. If the original code is already clear and intentional, leave it alone.
"No change" is a valid result. If a file is already clear and intentional, skip it.
Do not force changes to justify being invoked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines 0a42c282919f
- 5d ago Changed 422949668174
- 29d ago Changed 0cba56f721ef
- 1mo ago First seen · 149 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 7c68add74f31
code-simplify is a skill published in the GitHub repository kangig94/coral (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,524 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-pr-review
Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks…
github-review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…
find-simplifications
Use when asked to find or plan Cherry Studio cleanup, simplification, refactoring, dead-code removal, duplicated state removal, unnecessary APIs, speculative generality, or library replacements, especially when the result should become evidence-backed proposed Agent Notes.
flow-next-impl-review
Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.
flow-next-plan-review
Carmack-level review of a flow-next spec or plan via the configured backend. Use when asked to review a plan or spec.
flow-next-spec-completion-review
Verify that a spec's completed tasks fully implement the spec requirements. Use at spec completion before close.