Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/karrolcia/hippocampus/pseo-datanpx skills add karrolcia/hippocampus --skill pseo-datagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/karrolcia/hippocampusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/karrolcia/hippocampus/pseo-data)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/karrolcia/hippocampus/pseo-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/karrolcia/hippocampus/pseo-data.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00931 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00372 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
pseo-data scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 174 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 5993722790fa
pseo-data is a skill published in the GitHub repository karrolcia/hippocampus (13 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,862 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Prepare, validate, and publish a Pake release. Not for version bumps without release intent.
pake
Package any website or local web build into a lightweight desktop app using Pake (Tauri/Rust). Use when the user wants to: wrap a URL as a native app, build a desktop app from a website or a local dist/ folder, use Pake CLI to package a page, set up proxy for a packaged app, customize app icons or bundle IDs, or…
deep-review
Multi-dimensional code review. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, or audit a PR, diff, branch, or pasted change — including informal review asks like "look at this change for problems" — via light mode: one independent reviewer against the dimension quick checklists. Not for explain-only questions about what…
ux-audit
Audit a page / surface against the Designing Interfaces pattern language + the ux skill checklists, then land findings. Three layers — static (code), visual (screenshots), dynamic (automated user journey + perf). Use to run a repeatable, standards-based UX review of one screen.
ux
LobeHub product design values / principles / checklists. Use whenever the work touches user-interface features or implementation — designing or building any user-facing flow — to get better UX results.
acceptance
End-to-end verification and self-evidence for a delivery in any repository, with or without a preconfigured verify plan. Discover an existing plan when one was handed to this run; otherwise author checks and publish a standalone acceptance. Pick the proving surface (CLI / web / desktop / iOS Simulator), drive the real…