Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kasempiternal/axiom-v2 --skill ax-cloud-storagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kasempiternal/axiom-v2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/ax-cloud-storage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/ax-cloud-storage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/ax-cloud-storage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/ax-cloud-storage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/ax-cloud-storage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.04576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00915 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00458 |
Grade A, and why
ax-cloud-storage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 669 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cloud Storage
Quick Patterns
CloudKit vs iCloud Drive Decision
What are you syncing?
├─ Structured data (records, fields) → CloudKit
│ ├─ Using SwiftData? → SwiftData + CloudKit container
│ ├─ Using SQLiteData? → CKSyncEngine (manual sync)
│ └─ Custom data model? → CKSyncEngine or raw CloudKit APIs
│
├─ User documents/files → iCloud Drive
│ ├─ Standard document types? → UIDocument + ubiquitous container
│ ├─ Custom file formats? → NSFileCoordinator
│ └─ Small preferences (<1MB)? → NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore
│
└─ Both? → CloudKit for metadata, iCloud Drive for large files
Offline-First Pattern (Mandatory)
// ALWAYS: Write local first, sync in background
func saveTrack(_ track: Track) async throws {
// 1. Save locally FIRST (instant, works offline)
try database.insert(track)
// 2. Queue for sync (background, can fail)
syncEngine.queueChange(.save(track))
// 3. Never block UI on sync
// Sync happens asynchronously
}
// NEVER: Require network for local operations
// WRONG:
func saveTrack(_ track: Track) async throws {
try await cloudKit.save(track) // Fails offline!
}
CloudKit Three Approaches
// Approach 1: SwiftData + CloudKit (simplest)
let config = ModelConfiguration(
cloudKitDatabase: .private("iCloud.com.myapp")
)
let container = try ModelContainer(for: Track.self, configurations: config)
// Automatic sync - no additional code needed
// Approach 2: CKSyncEngine (WWDC 2023 - recommended for custom sync)
let syncEngine = CKSyncEngine(
configuration: CKSyncEngine.Configuration(
database: CKContainer.default().privateCloudDatabase,
stateSerialization: loadSavedState(),
delegate: self
)
)
// Approach 3: Raw CloudKit APIs (full control)
let container = CKContainer.default()
let privateDB = container.privateCloudDatabase
CKSyncEngine Delegate
class SyncDelegate: CKSyncEngineDelegate {
func handleEvent(_ event: CKSyncEngine.Event, syncEngine: CKSyncEngine) {
switch event {
case .stateUpdate(let stateUpdate):
// Save state for persistence across launches
saveSyncState(stateUpdate.stateSerialization)
case .accountChange(let event):
handleAccountChange(event)
case .fetchedDatabaseChanges(let changes):
handleDatabaseChanges(changes)
case .fetchedRecordZoneChanges(let changes):
handleZoneChanges(changes)
case .sentDatabaseChanges(let sentChanges):
handleSentDatabaseChanges(sentChanges)
case .sentRecordZoneChanges(let sentChanges):
handleSentZoneChanges(sentChanges)
default: break
}
}
func nextRecordZoneChangeBatch(
_ context: CKSyncEngine.SendChangesContext,
syncEngine: CKSyncEngine
) async -> CKSyncEngine.RecordZoneChangeBatch? {
let pendingChanges = syncEngine.state.pendingRecordZoneChanges
return await CKSyncEngine.RecordZoneChangeBatch(
pendingChanges: pendingChanges
) { recordID in
// Convert local record to CKRecord
self.recordForID(recordID)
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 669 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A d7b4ca2bde8d
ax-cloud-storage is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kasempiternal/axiom-v2 (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 4,576 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow-audit
Systematic UI workflow auditing for SwiftUI applications. Discovers entry points, traces user flows, detects dead ends and broken promises, audits data wiring, evaluates from user perspective. Triggers: "workflow audit", "audit flows", "find dead ends", "check navigation".
swift-expert
Expert-level Swift development for iOS, macOS with SwiftUI, Combine, and modern Swift 5.9+. Use when the user mentions iOS, macOS, SwiftUI, Combine, async await, or Apple platforms, or when the task involves Modern Swift Features, Basics and Optionals, Functions and Closures, or Structs and Classes.
ios-expert
Expert in iOS development with SwiftUI, UIKit, Combine, and Apple ecosystem integration. Use when the user mentions mobile, Swift, SwiftUI, UIKit, Apple platforms, or Xcode, or when the task involves iOS App Architecture, SwiftUI Fundamentals, UIKit Essentials, or Combine Framework.
swift-focusengine-pro
Reviews, writes, and fixes focus management code for all Apple platforms (tvOS, iOS/iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS, macOS), covering SwiftUI, UIKit, AppKit, and RealityKit. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing apps that handle focus, hover, key view loops, or Digital Crown navigation.
swift-architecture-skill
Swift iOS architecture guidance and playbooks for MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, VIPER, MVP, Coordinator, and Reactive patterns. Use when designing, implementing, refactoring, or reviewing the architecture of a SwiftUI or UIKit feature, module, or codebase.
antigravity-root
Enterprise-grade iOS development workflow for TTBaseUIKit-powered apps. Cross-functional product analysis | MVVM-C Architecture | UIKit + SwiftUI | TTViewCodable | TTBaseSUI | xcodebuild CLI Verification | Zero Regression | iOS 14+.