to-tasks

to-tasks is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from KaydenClark/LLM_Workbench. It costs 18 tokens per session (1,611 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A procedure for turning an approved Workbench specification into dependency-aware task records. A specification describes the intended work, while each task records one smaller piece of it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to convert approved specification slices into task files, activate a planned specification when requested, and preserve the generated task board as a view rather than a second tracker.
Why use it?
It prevents new tasks from being scattered across extra trackers and waits to create them until the specification is activated.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to convert approved specification slices into task files, activate a planned specification when requested, and preserve the generated task board as a view rather than a second tracker.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add KaydenClark/LLM_Workbench --skill to-tasks
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KaydenClark/LLM_Workbench

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for to-tasks

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for to-tasks

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kaydenclark/llm_workbench/to-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,611 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.01611
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00644
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00322
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00161

Measured 12d ago against content hash dbf23deb835d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

to-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

workbench/skills/to-tasks/SKILL.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

To Tasks

The assigned SPEC.md names the destination. Each approved slice becomes its own tasks/<TK-###>/TASK.md record inside the assigned Spec; a Spec that still holds only the legacy slice table is converted first (step 4), and its table is history, never a place for a new slice. The assigned Spec is the only store. TASKBOARD.md is a generated projection, not a second tracker.

Confirm the assigned spec resolves through workbench/manifest.json before changing it. Never recreate a root specs/ queue or a project-local skill-discovery tree.

Cut Tasks when the Spec is activated (planned -> active), from live Actuality at the real start of the work; a planned Spec gets no Tasks unless the same request activates it. If the assigned Spec is still planned and the request does not activate it, report that its decomposition waits for activation and write no Task. When the same request activates it, activate it with node workbench/tools/spec-workbench.mjs convert-tasks S-### --activate, run once, and never edit its **Status:** by hand:

  • A planned Spec that still holds unfinished slice-table rows: the command turns those rows into TASK.md records and sets its **Status:** to active in one step, writing nothing if any record fails to parse.
  • A planned record-backed Spec (it already has a tasks/ directory; to-spec leaves a new Spec that way, with no Task row and an empty tracked tasks/): write its first TASK.md record(s) as in step 4, requesting each label with next-id, then run the command once. It converts no row: it refuses, writing nothing, when the Spec has no record or a record fails to parse, and otherwise sets only its **Status:** to active.

Either way the command changes no other header field, so update Latest event and Next gate yourself. Tasks already cut into an existing planned Spec stay as they are.

Process

  1. Read the assigned SPEC.md and the relevant source and tests. Do not select an unassigned spec.
  2. Propose vertical slices that each deliver a checkable behavior in one context. Apply the /tracer-bullet discipline so each slice pierces every layer of the project's stack rather than one layer. Give each a short outcome-oriented title, real blockers, done criteria, and closing proof. Prefer an independent first tracer bullet; use expand-contract when a wide refactor cannot stay green by vertical slice.
  3. If the owner has not already authorized this decomposition, present the proposed set and ask for approval before changing durable work state, and confirm that slice size and blocking edges are right. When the request or the composing workflow already carries that planning authority, do not ask again (workbench/docs/adr/0045-skill-composition-within-inherited-scope.md); state the set you are writing and continue.
  4. With that authority, use spec-workbench.mjs next-id S-### --prefix TK --json for each new label. It proposes a letter-bearing ID from the whole Workbench inventory without reserving it; save each planned Task before requesting the next. Preserve existing spec-qualified numeric Task references.
    • If the assigned Spec already has a tasks/ directory, it is record-backed: write one tasks/<TK-###>/TASK.md per approved slice. It opens with the title line # TK-### - <slice> (the parser refuses a record without it) and carries one **Field:** value line each for Task ID, Spec ID, Slice, Status (ready unless a real blocker applies), Stance (the normal stance for the executor: Builder, Auditor, Reviewer or Reconciler), Blockers (none, or a comma-separated list of S-###/TK-### ids), and Destination (spec-acceptance: <the Acceptance Criteria line this Task advances>, or wiki-claim: <the Wiki page> only when the Task's own destination is producing that page; a corrective Task never takes a Wiki claim as its destination, and a later gap against delivered work is a new Spec, not a Task). Add Planned verification naming the check the Task expects to run. Add no table rows; a record-backed Spec's retained Vertical Implementation Slices table is completed history only. When that Spec is still planned and the same request activates it, run convert-tasks S-### --activate once after writing the records. A record looks like this:

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 122 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A dbf23deb835d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

to-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository KaydenClark/LLM_Workbench (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,611 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.