code-philosophy

A set of internal principles for keeping application logic and data flow simple, predictable, and resistant to errors.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when designing or reviewing backend logic, React components, hooks, state management, and other code that validates input or moves data through an application.
Why use it?
It provides consistent ways to handle invalid input, reduce deep nesting, and prevent impossible or confusing states in code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kdcokenny/ocx/code-philosophy
Any agent
npx skills add kdcokenny/ocx --skill code-philosophy
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kdcokenny/ocx

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 582 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.00582
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00291
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00116
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00058

Measured 3d ago against content hash 7f15b42b52e5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-philosophy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

workers/kdco-registry/files/skills/code-philosophy/SKILL.md · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Internal Logic Philosophy: The 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Role: Principal Engineer for all Internal Logic & Data Flow — applies to backend, React components, hooks, state management, and any code where functionality matters.

Philosophy: Elegant Simplicity — code should guide data so naturally that errors become impossible, keeping core logic flat, readable, and pristine.

The 5 Laws

1. The Law of the Early Exit (Guard Clauses)

  • Concept: Indentation is the enemy of simplicity. Deep nesting hides bugs.
  • Rule: Handle edge cases, nulls, and errors at the very top of functions.
  • Practice: Use if (!valid) return; doWork(); instead of if (valid) { doWork(); }.

2. Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Parse, Don't Validate)

  • Concept: Don't check data repeatedly; structure it so it can't be wrong.
  • Rule: Parse inputs at the boundary. Once data enters internal logic, it must be in trusted, typed state.
  • Why: Removes defensive checks deep in algorithmic code, keeping core logic pristine.

3. The Law of Atomic Predictability

  • Concept: A function must never surprise the caller.
  • Rule: Functions should be "Pure" where possible. Same Input = Same Output. No hidden mutations.
  • Defense: Avoid void functions that mutate global state. Return new data structures instead.

4. The Law of "Fail Fast, Fail Loud"

  • Concept: Silent failures cause complexity later.
  • Rule: If a state is invalid, halt immediately with a descriptive error. Do not try to "patch" bad data.
  • Result: Keeps logic simple by never accounting for "half-broken" states.

5. The Law of Intentional Naming

  • Concept: Comments are often a crutch for bad code.
  • Rule: Variables and functions must be named so clearly that logic reads like an English sentence.
  • Defense: isUserEligible is better than check(). The name itself guarantees the boolean logic.

Adherence Checklist

Before completing your task, verify:

  • Guard Clauses: Are all edge cases handled at the top with early returns?
  • Parsed State: Is data parsed into trusted types at the boundary?
  • Purity: Are functions predictable and free of hidden mutations?
  • Fail Loud: Do invalid states throw clear, descriptive errors immediately?
  • Readability: Does the logic read like an English sentence?

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 48 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7f15b42b52e5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-philosophy is a skill published in the GitHub repository kdcokenny/ocx (934 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ce:plan

Create structured plans for any multi-step task -- software features, research workflows, events, study plans, or any goal that benefits from structured breakdown. Also deepen existing plans with interactive review of sub-agent findings. Use for plan creation when the user says 'plan this', 'create a plan', 'write a…

marcusrbrown/systematic · 152 tokens

ce:review

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.

marcusrbrown/systematic · 36 tokens

ce:compound-refresh

Refresh stale or drifting learnings and pattern docs in docs/solutions/ by reviewing, updating, consolidating, replacing, or deleting them against the current codebase. Use after refactors, migrations, dependency upgrades, or when a retrieved learning feels outdated or wrong. Also use when reviewing docs/solutions/…

marcusrbrown/systematic · 105 tokens

ce:compound

Document a recently solved problem to compound your team's knowledge.

marcusrbrown/systematic · 14 tokens

ce:work

Execute work efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features.

marcusrbrown/systematic · 13 tokens

onboarding

Generate or regenerate ONBOARDING.md to help new contributors understand a codebase. Use when the user asks to 'create onboarding docs', 'generate ONBOARDING.md', 'document this project for new developers', 'write onboarding documentation', 'vonboard', 'vonboarding', 'prepare this repo for a new contributor', 'refresh…

marcusrbrown/systematic · 114 tokens