Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add keaizuizui/CodeRef-AI --skill coderef-assetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/keaizuizui/CodeRef-AIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/keaizuizui/coderef-ai/coderef-asset)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/keaizuizui/coderef-ai/coderef-asset"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/keaizuizui/coderef-ai/coderef-asset/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/keaizuizui/coderef-ai/coderef-asset"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/keaizuizui/coderef-ai/coderef-asset.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00281 | $0.02480 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00140 | $0.01240 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00496 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
coderef-asset scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +45 tokens per session a68f0dc05941
- 8d ago First seen · 86 lines · 236 tokens per session scan A 678fbec30d8f
coderef-asset is a skill published in the GitHub repository keaizuizui/CodeRef-AI (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 281 tokens to every session and 2,480 once invoked, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
software-code-review
Evaluate source code for correctness, quality, security, style conformance, and maintainability, producing a structured review report with findings and recommendations. Use when the user wants to review, critique, audit, evaluate, or inspect source code — checking for bugs, logic errors, unhandled error paths…
engineering-grill
Run a project-start interview against the live engineering rules pack, decide which engineering domains apply, put the highest-consequence questions first, and record terminology, decisions, risks, and build gates. Use when a user explicitly asks for an Engineering Grill before building or substantially redesigning a…
craft-fix
The Craftsman standard for driving fixes against an existing craft-audit workspace — "fix the findings", "fix SEC-003", "work through the audit", "start the climb". An ACTION skill, not a domain: it picks findings off the master tracker's climb sequence, re-verifies each is still real, gets the user's approval, and…
craft-audit
The front door to the craft skills — a whole-project production-readiness orchestrator that drives the ten per-domain craft skills (ux, frontend, backend, db, security, infra, observability, testing, lint, ai) instead of auditing one surface at a time. It discovers the project's shape, plans an audit per surface, and…
craft-ai
The Craftsman standard for LLM-powered features — prompt-injection surface, key and spend protection, PII reaching model APIs, and reliability/eval discipline. Use whenever work touches an LLM integration: a chatbot or agent, a RAG pipeline, an LLM call from a route or job, tool/function-calling, or reviewing prompts…
craft-observability
The Craftsman standard for production observability — error tracking (Sentry), metrics & dashboards (Grafana), structured logging, tracing, SLOs, and alerting. Use this WHENEVER the work touches observability: adding or reviewing Sentry, wiring Grafana/Prometheus/OpenTelemetry, setting up structured logs, defining…