Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kelvinkosbab/AppBootstrapAI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kelvinkosbab/AppBootstrapAI/main/.claude/skills/swift-testing-pro/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kelvinkosbab/AppBootstrapAIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kelvinkosbab/appbootstrapai/swift-testing-pro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kelvinkosbab/appbootstrapai/swift-testing-pro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kelvinkosbab/appbootstrapai/swift-testing-pro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00959 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00479 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
swift-testing-pro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to swift-testing-pro — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write and review Swift Testing code for correctness, modern API usage, and adherence to project conventions. Report only genuine problems - do not nitpick or invent issues.
Review process:
- Ensure tests follow core Swift Testing conventions using
references/core-rules.md. - Validate test structure, assertions, dependency injection, and other best practices using
references/writing-better-tests.md. - Check async tests, confirmations, time limits, actor isolation, and networking mocks using
references/async-tests.md. - Ensure new features like raw identifiers, test scopes, exit tests, and attachments are used correctly using
references/new-features.md. - If migrating from XCTest, follow the conversion guidance in
references/migrating-from-xctest.md.
If doing partial work, load only the relevant reference files.
Core Instructions
- Target Swift 6.2 or later, using modern Swift concurrency.
- As a Swift Testing developer, the user wants all new unit and integration tests to be written using Swift Testing, and they may ask for help migrating existing XCTest code to Swift Testing.
- Swift Testing does not support UI tests – XCTest must be used there.
- Use a consistent project structure, with folder layout determined by app features.
Swift Testing evolves with each Swift release, so expect three to four releases each year, each introducing new features. This means existing training data you have will naturally be outdated or missing key features.
This skill specifically draws upon the very latest Swift and Swift Testing code, which means it will suggest things you are not aware of. Treat the user’s installed toolchain as authoritative, but there's a fairly high chance Apple's documentation about the APIs will be stale, so treat them carefully.
Output Format
If the user asks for a review, organize findings by file. For each issue:
- State the file and relevant line(s).
- Name the rule being violated.
- Show a brief before/after code fix.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 98 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A ad4f1bff44b5
swift-testing-pro is a skill published in the GitHub repository kelvinkosbab/AppBootstrapAI (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 959 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to swift-testing-pro, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
kotlin-testing
Expert guidance on Kotlin unit testing with JUnit 5, MockK, kotlinx-coroutines-test, Turbine, and fluent assertion libraries. Use this when writing or reviewing unit tests.
compose-animations
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose motion: visibility enter/exit, animating one property toward a target, color or size transitions, multiple properties from one state, switching composable content, or choosing between AnimatedVisibility, animateAsState, rememberTransition, AnimatedContent, and Crossfade.
compose-focus-navigation
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI for TV, keyboard, desktop, accessibility focus, D-pad navigation, FocusRequester, focusProperties, key events, or initial focus behavior.
kotlin-control-flow
Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin branching and control flow: when expressions, guard conditions, sealed type exhaustiveness, smart casts, nullable branching, early returns, or replacing complex if/else chains.
using-chrisbanes-skills
Use when debugging, benchmarking, or profiling leads into Kotlin or Jetpack Compose source before the cause is known, or when one task spans multiple Kotlin or Compose concerns, especially plain Kotlin Flow or navigation delivery plus sealed branching.
kotlin-api-design
Use when designing or reviewing Kotlin function ownership, member or extension functions, factories, single-field domain types, value classes, data classes, Kotlin Multiplatform expect/actual declarations, or platform service boundaries.