burndown-full

burndown-full is a skill for Claude Code from kensaurus/cursor-kenji. It costs 59 tokens per session (2,933 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for finishing a planned code change across an entire repository after an earlier attempt stopped partway through.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for repository-wide replacements, half-finished migrations, and changes that must reach every relevant file.
Why use it?
It finds remaining old code from a fresh search, including overlooked tests, stories, and re-exports, so a partial migration is not mistaken for completion.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; names the TodoWrite tool; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the cursor-kenji plugin — 132 skills, 63 commands, 6 agents, 1 hook, 3 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Use it for repository-wide replacements, half-finished migrations, and changes that must reach every relevant file.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add kensaurus/cursor-kenji --skill burndown-full
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kensaurus/cursor-kenji

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cursor-kenji, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 132 skills, 63 commands, 6 agents, 1 hook, 3 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for burndown-full

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for burndown-full

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/burndown-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,933 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.02933
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.01173
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00587
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00293

Measured 26d ago against content hash f089e395ff8c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

burndown-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/burndown-full/SKILL.md · 175 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Burndown Full

Degree of freedom: MIXED. Signature and batch sizing [HIGH freedom]; from-scratch re-search and the zero-hit gate [LOW freedom — run exactly].

How to reason

  1. Observe — the old pattern's remaining hits from a fresh search
  2. Interpret — planned files vs the real blast radius (tests, barrels, stories)
  3. Classify — still-old / already-new / false-positive
  4. Severity — leftover production call sites outrank a comment in CHANGELOG

Worked example

Observe: plan listed 8 files; fresh rg Button2 finds 14 (plus a story and a re-export). Interpret: the plan was a hypothesis; barrels were missed. Classify: 6 extra call sites still-old; CHANGELOG mention is false-positive. Done: re-search → 0 real hits; typecheck/lint/tests green.

Self-critique before reporting

  • Fresh search — done is zero hits from scratch, not memory
  • Plan is not the boundary — extras were appended, not ignored
  • No skip — tests/stories/re-exports burned down too
  • Right owner — one approved plan + deferrals → complete-everything; inventory → housekeep-backlog

What problem this solves

A coding agent is given a plan, generates it, starts executing, and then stops before the change is actually complete across the codebase. The user is left with a half-migrated repo. This is not a motivation problem — it is a well-documented set of failure modes in long-horizon LLM agents:

  • Compaction. Long runs get compacted; anything that lived only in the transcript — including "what's left to do" — is gone afterwards. The remaining work has to live in a file.
  • Premature termination. When tool outputs and history get pruned or summarized to save context, agents lose task-level awareness ("how many items remain, am I near done?") and declare completion early. The fix shown in the research is to keep a condensed, persistent record of remaining work visible at all times.
  • Plan-as-boundary error. A plan is a hypothesis about scope produced before the repo was fully explored. The real set of affected files is almost always larger than the plan's list (barrels, tests, stories, configs, re-exports, dynamic usages). Treating the plan's file list as the boundary guarantees an incomplete burndown.

Read the full file on GitHub · 175 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 26d ago Changed f089e395ff8c
  2. 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines · -11 tokens per session 7de2919182fe
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 176 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 106bc038cb79

Subscribe to this mod's changes

burndown-full is a skill published in the GitHub repository kensaurus/cursor-kenji (9 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,933 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.