Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kensaurus/cursor-kenji --skill mushi-integrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kensaurus/cursor-kenjiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/mushi-integration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/mushi-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/mushi-integration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/mushi-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/mushi-integration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01891 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00756 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
mushi-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mushi Integration Smoke Test
Degree of freedom: MIXED. Pass/fail judgment [HIGH freedom];
Stages 1–6 probes and DB verifies [LOW freedom — run exactly].
How to reason
- Observe — each stage's CLI output and DB row
- Interpret — stage failed vs still-pending vs expected-failure (test detected friction)
- Classify — capture / triage / map / gen / run / pdca
- Severity —
classify-reportdown outranks optional Stage 7 dashboard drift
Worked example
Observe:
mushi test→rep_…; DB stillpendingat 70s;mushi doctorwas green. Interpret: capture wrote;classify-reportdid not. Classify: Stage 2 fail — checkget_logs; do not start story mapping. Verify: summary marks Stage 2 ❌; later stages skipped;diagnose_setupnext.
Self-critique before reporting
- Health first —
mushi doctorgreen before Stage 1 - DB verify — each stage checked the row, not only CLI text
- Expected fail ok — Stage 5
failedstill counts if the test executed - Right owner — component down →
mushi-health; targeted diagnosis →diagnose_setup
Exercises every stage of the Mushi pipeline end-to-end. Run after setup, after a deploy, or any time you need proof that the whole loop works.
Prerequisites [LOW freedom — run exactly]
mushi doctorpasses (all green) — runmushi-healthfirst if unsure.- At least one BYOK key for
anthropicandfirecrawlis active. - You have the app URL you want to map stories from.
Stage 1 — Bug capture [LOW freedom — run exactly]
Send a real test report through the SDK pipeline:
mushi test
Expected: Test report submitted — id: rep_...
Verify in DB (Supabase MCP):
SELECT id, status, severity, category, created_at
FROM reports
ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 1;
Expected: a row with status = classified and a non-null severity within ~30 seconds.
If still pending after 60 s: classify-report edge function failed — check get_logs(service: 'api').
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 256 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 2e9acebf9e3b
mushi-integration is a skill published in the GitHub repository kensaurus/cursor-kenji (9 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,891 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature, bugfix, or code change - write tests first, watch them fail, then implement.
patrol-e2e-testing
Use when writing E2E/integration tests, testing native interactions like permissions or system dialogs, capturing UI regressions, or validating cross-platform behavior (Patrol 4.x).
webapp-qa
Perform scoped exploratory QA of a web application, reproduce defects, collect screenshots and console evidence, and deliver a prioritized report.
testing
Use when writing or reviewing Flutter/Dart tests (unit, widget, golden), fixing flaky tests, adding coverage, or choosing between unit and widget tests.
debugging
Playwright test debugging conventions for the scaffold — reading failure messages, classifying failure modes (TimeoutError, ZodError, strict-mode violation, locator not found, network errors, schema drift), the playwright.config.ts capture defaults (trace on-first-retry, screenshot only-on-failure, video…
Flaky Test Doctor
Diagnose flaky test failures from Playwright reports, traces, and rerun history. Classify each failure as product, test, environment, data, or unknown with cited evidence and a proposed fix. Never auto-modifies code without opt-in.