empirical-verification

empirical-verification is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines. It costs 34 tokens per session (473 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A software-testing method that checks assumptions by running small experiments and comparing the results with what you expected.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for debugging unexpected behavior, reviewing code, checking proposed fixes, and verifying that software works before release.
Why use it?
It reduces debugging based on guesses and helps reveal whether a suspected cause is real before code is changed or declared working.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for debugging unexpected behavior, reviewing code, checking proposed fixes, and verifying that software works before release.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines --skill empirical-verification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for empirical-verification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for empirical-verification

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/empirical-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 473 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00473
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00236
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00095
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00047

Measured 12d ago against content hash d12ae06e7e47, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

empirical-verification scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

Experiment: small repro (script, curl, log line)
knowledge/skills/empirical-verification/SKILL.md · 49 lines

What it actually says

Empirical Verification

Every assumption must be tethered to reality.

The process

When you believe something about how code behaves, devise a hypothesis and test it. Write a small script. Add a log statement. Run the debugger. If the empirics match your expectation, proceed. If they do not, you have found a bug, a misconception, or a premature assumption -- investigate.

Search before invent

Search online to see if others have observed the same behavior. Read the documentation to understand what is actually supposed to happen. Explain to yourself what the system is doing and why. Only once you understand the behavior should you attempt to change it.

Root cause fixes

Fix problems at the root cause. Surface-level patches create debt. If a function fails under certain inputs, do not add a guard clause at the call site. Fix the function. If a system misbehaves under load, do not retry until it works. Find the bottleneck.

Quick fixes become permanent fixtures. The shortcut you take today becomes the constraint you work around tomorrow.

Verify before ship

The pattern is simple: do not guess when you can verify. A distinguished engineer does not assume they remember how an API works -- they check. Especially true for security code, payments, and external services.

Quality measurement

The quality of your work is measured by how well you interact with the real world. Not by how clever your abstractions are. Not by how quickly you produce code. By whether the code actually does what it is supposed to do when it runs.

Pattern: form-test-report

Hypothesis:  X happens when Y
Experiment:  small repro (script, curl, log line)
Observed:    actual output
Conclusion:  hypothesis confirmed | refuted | partial; here's the new theory

Apply this loop to every uncertain claim before writing a fix.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 49 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A d12ae06e7e47

Subscribe to this mod's changes

empirical-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 473 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

blazemeter-troubleshooting

Comprehensive troubleshooting guide for BlazeMeter, covering API Monitoring, Performance Testing, general issues, integrations, and security. Use when troubleshooting for (1) API Monitoring issues (Radar Agent auth, SSL certificates, debug tests), (2) Performance Testing issues (high response time, 500 errors, partial…

Blazemeter/bzm-mcp · 131 tokens

windows-test-truth

Diagnose Windows test runs that lie — os error 4551 means the binary never executed, and a workspace test total can silently lose every suite after a blocked one. Use when cargo test reports a failure with no failing test named, when a test count looks lower than expected on Windows, or when a freshly built binary…

AURORA-NEURO/aurora-agent · 77 tokens

bestow-curse

Bestow Curse saddles a target with a lasting disadvantage. The real-world version is constraint injection: deliberately adding friction, limitations, or handicaps to see how a system, process, or team adapts. This is the skill of resilience testing through artificial adversity — bandwidth throttling, feature removal…

Hmbown/Wizards-of-the-Ghosts · 68 tokens

confusion

Confusion makes targets act randomly and unpredictably. The real-world version is chaos engineering: injecting controlled randomness, unexpected inputs, and edge cases to discover how systems behave when things go wrong. This is fuzzing, monkey testing, and the art of breaking things on purpose so they do not break by…

Hmbown/Wizards-of-the-Ghosts · 65 tokens

resilireplay

Capture a supported coding-agent tool failure as bounded, sanitized evidence and generate an executable deterministic regression. Use when a user asks to capture, explain, reproduce, or prevent recurrence of a Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, or MCP tool failure, or to validate a ResiliReplay adapter or campaign.

aliengineering-byte/resilireplay · 65 tokens

adhoc-verification

Produce fresh, focused, local verification evidence for a code change without relying on the full test suite. Use when a system reminder (or the user) demands ad-hoc verification after an edit, or when you want to prove one behavior in isolation. Covers the correct way to write a throwaway supertest/harness script…

pedroiff0/awesome-skills · 86 tokens