Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines --skill yeetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-MachinesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/yeet)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/yeet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/yeet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/yeet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevin-liu-01/agent-machines/yeet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
yeet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Prerequisites
- Require GitHub CLI
gh. Checkgh --version. If missing, ask the user to installghand stop. - Require authenticated
ghsession. Rungh auth status. If not authenticated, ask the user to rungh auth login(and re-rungh auth status) before continuing.
Naming conventions
- Branch:
codex/{description}when starting from main/master/default. - Commit:
{description}(terse). - PR title:
[codex] {description}summarizing the full diff.
Workflow
- If on main/master/default, create a branch:
git checkout -b "codex/{description}" - Otherwise stay on the current branch.
- Confirm status, then stage everything:
git status -sbthengit add -A. - Commit tersely with the description:
git commit -m "{description}" - Run checks if not already. If checks fail due to missing deps/tools, install dependencies and rerun once.
- Push with tracking:
git push -u origin $(git branch --show-current) - If git push fails due to workflow auth errors, pull from master and retry the push.
- Open a PR and edit title/body to reflect the description and the deltas:
GH_PROMPT_DISABLED=1 GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0 gh pr create --draft --fill --head $(git branch --show-current) - Write the PR description to a temp file with real newlines (e.g. pr-body.md ... EOF) and run pr-body.md to avoid \n-escaped markdown.
- PR description (markdown) must be detailed prose covering the issue, the cause and effect on users, the root cause, the fix, and any tests or checks used to validate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 2b4583b296a3
yeet is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines (29 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
yeet compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yeetKevin-Liu-01/Agent-Machines | Skill | 29 | 15d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code, Codex |
| git-wrapupcyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server | Skill | 702 | 6d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 109 | Claude Code |
| studio-source-controlserac-labs/serac | Skill | 77 | 17d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| git-wrapupcyanheads/mcp-reporter | Skill | 13 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 33 | Claude Code, Codex |
| git-conventional-commitspedroiff0/awesome-skills | Skill | 1 | 14d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code, Codex |
| git-wrapupcyanheads/mcp-ts-core | Skill | 153 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 109 | Claude Code, Codex |
| git-wrapupcyanheads/pubmed-mcp-server | Skill | 167 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 109 | Claude Code |