Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/keyvaluesoftwaresystems/agent-opfor/opfor-runnpx skills add KeyValueSoftwareSystems/agent-opfor --skill opfor-rungit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KeyValueSoftwareSystems/agent-opforWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/keyvaluesoftwaresystems/agent-opfor/opfor-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/keyvaluesoftwaresystems/agent-opfor/opfor-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/keyvaluesoftwaresystems/agent-opfor/opfor-run.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.04830 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.02415 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00966 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00483 |
Grade A, and why
opfor-run scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionslowSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
[Single-turn: show prompt + response] Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 438 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 38089b199055
opfor-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository KeyValueSoftwareSystems/agent-opfor (577 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 4,830 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-security-review
Activate when the user asks to audit, review, scan, or assess the security of an AI application, agent, chatbot, or LLM-powered system. Also activate when the user mentions prompt injection, data exfiltration, guardrail bypass, red-teaming, AI SBOM, cognitive policy, OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, or EU AI Act…
sbom-analysis
Activate when the user opens, mentions, or asks questions about a .sbom.json file, an AI Bill of Materials, an aibom.json, or asks about what AI components an application uses. Also activate when the user asks about component dependencies, LLM model usage, tool permissions, datastore access, or the attack surface of…
orchestrating-llm-attacks-with-pyrit
Build multi-turn, Crescendo, and Tree-of-Attacks-with-Pruning (TAP) automated attack chains against conversational LLM agents using Microsoft PyRIT, with adversarial chat and scorer feedback loops.
continuous-llm-red-teaming-with-promptfoo
Wire Promptfoo and DeepTeam into CI/CD for automated regression red-teaming of LLM apps against OWASP LLM Top 10 and OWASP Agentic presets, failing the build when jailbreak or injection vulnerabilities regress.
red-teaming-llms-with-garak
Run NVIDIA garak probe suites against an LLM endpoint to test for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data leakage, and toxic generation, then interpret the hit-rate report for triage and reporting.
skill-inspector
Review AI agent skills before installation using NVIDIA SkillSpector and source-aware semantic review. Use when asked whether a skill or downloaded skill folder is safe, trustworthy, installable, over-permissioned, or malicious.