Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude --skill git-undogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhaledSaeed18/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/git-undo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/git-undo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/git-undo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/git-undo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/git-undo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
git-undo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Undo the mistake with the least-destructive tool that fits, after establishing two facts that change everything: has the work been committed, and has it been pushed/shared. Get those wrong and you either lose work or rewrite history other people depend on.
Hard rules: never break these
- Diagnose before acting. Establish: committed or not? pushed or not? on a shared branch? Run
git status,git log --oneline -10, andgit reflog -20first. The fix depends entirely on the answers. - Never rewrite published history casually. For anything already pushed to a shared branch, undo forward with
git revert; do notreset/rebase/commit --amendand force-push unless the user explicitly owns the consequences and coordinates with collaborators. - Take a safety net before any destructive op. Before
reset --hard, a force-push, or a history rewrite, snapshot the current tip:git branch backup/<desc>orgit tag backup/<desc>. Reflog usually saves you, but a branch is free insurance. --hardandcleandestroy uncommitted work irrecoverably. Reflog only recovers committed states. Spell out exactly what will be lost and confirm before running them.- Confirm before any destructive or shared-history command:
reset --hard,clean -fd,push --force*, history rewrites. Preferpush --force-with-leaseover--forcewhen a rewrite is genuinely required.
Step 1: Diagnose
git status: staged vs unstaged vs untracked; any operation in progress.git log --oneline --graph -15: recent commits and branch shape.git reflog -25: the time machine, every positionHEADhas held, even "lost" ones. This is how you recover almost anything committed.- Determine shared or local: has the affected commit/branch been pushed?
git status(ahead/behind),git branch -r --contains <sha>.
Step 2: Pick the fix
Match the situation to the safest tool:
Uncommitted work
- Discard changes in a file →
git restore <file>(wasgit checkout -- <file>). - Unstage but keep changes →
git restore --staged <file>(wasgit reset HEAD <file>). - Set aside without losing →
git stash push -m "<note>"; bring back withgit stash pop. - Remove untracked files →
git clean -nd(dry run first!), thengit clean -fdonce confirmed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A d36357b5ac55
git-undo is a skill published in the GitHub repository KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-workflow
GitHub best practices for pull requests, code reviews, issues, Actions workflows, and repository management.
git-workflow
Git conventions and workflow guidelines using Conventional Commits, branching strategies, and best practices for version control.
lerna
Best practices for Lerna monorepo management, versioning, and publishing.
git-pushing
Stage, commit, and push git changes with conventional commit messages. Use when user wants to commit and push changes, mentions pushing to remote, or asks to save and push their work. Also activates when user says "push changes", "commit and push", "push this", "push to github", or similar git workflow requests.
github-activity
Report what happened across GitHub repositories over a time window, read only. Invoke when the user asks what merged, which issues were opened or closed, or what moved between milestones since a date or since the last report, across one or more repositories.
implement-issue
Turn one labelled GitHub issue into one reviewed pull request, or stop with a stated reason. Use for every factory run; the message is a link to the issue.