solution-testing

Guidance for testing complete user journeys through a web application, including browser, server, and database behaviour. It also covers BDD, a testing approach that describes expected behaviour in plain-language scenarios such as Given, When, and Then.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write Playwright or Cypress browser tests, test full-stack journeys, create BDD scenarios, set up post-release checks, or investigate unreliable end-to-end tests.
Why use it?
It helps verify that a feature works from the user's perspective, not just inside individual pieces of code. It also explains the trade-offs of slower, more maintenance-heavy browser tests.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing
Any agent
npx skills add kid-sid/codex-spellbook --skill solution-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kid-sid/codex-spellbook

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,566 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00041 $0.03566
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01783
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00713
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00357

Measured 2d ago against content hash 2864669588f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

solution-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/solution-testing/SKILL.md · 416 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Solution Testing

End-to-end and acceptance testing techniques for verifying that a feature works correctly across the full stack — browser, API, and data layer — from the user's perspective.

When to Activate

  • Writing browser automation tests for user journeys
  • Verifying a full feature works end-to-end (UI through DB)
  • Setting up Playwright or Cypress for a project
  • Writing BDD feature files with Gherkin syntax
  • Designing smoke tests for post-deployment verification
  • Debugging flaky E2E tests
  • Deciding how many E2E tests to write for a feature

E2E vs Integration: The Boundary

E2E tests cover things integration tests cannot:

  • Real browser rendering and JavaScript execution (layout, event handling, hydration)
  • Full stack traversal: UI → API → DB → UI response cycle
  • Multi-step user journeys across pages, sessions, and auth boundaries

Cost of Each Test Level

Type Speed Flakiness Risk Maintenance Cost
Unit ms Very low Low
Integration seconds Low Medium
E2E 10s–minutes High High

The Honeycomb Model

Prefer more service-level integration tests over E2E tests. E2E tests are expensive to write, slow to run, and prone to flakiness. Use them sparingly.

  • Write E2E tests only for critical user journeys: login, checkout, core business workflows
  • Do not write E2E tests for every edge case — cover those with unit and integration tests
  • Aim for: many unit tests → more integration tests → few targeted E2E tests

Playwright Setup and Patterns

Project Setup

npm init playwright@latest
# or add to an existing project:
npm install -D @playwright/test
npx playwright install

Config (playwright.config.ts):

import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test';

export default defineConfig({
  testDir: './e2e',
  fullyParallel: true,
  retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0,
  reporter: [['html'], ['list']],
  use: {
    baseURL: process.env.BASE_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3000',
    screenshot: 'only-on-failure',
    video: 'retain-on-failure',
    trace: 'on-first-retry',
  },
  projects: [
    { name: 'chromium', use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] } },
  ],
  webServer: {
    command: 'npm run start',
    url: 'http://localhost:3000',
    reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI,
  },
});

Read the full file on GitHub · 416 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 416 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 2864669588f9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

solution-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository kid-sid/codex-spellbook (21 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens