Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testingnpx skills add kid-sid/codex-spellbook --skill solution-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kid-sid/codex-spellbookWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.03566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01783 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00713 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
solution-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Solution Testing
End-to-end and acceptance testing techniques for verifying that a feature works correctly across the full stack — browser, API, and data layer — from the user's perspective.
When to Activate
- Writing browser automation tests for user journeys
- Verifying a full feature works end-to-end (UI through DB)
- Setting up Playwright or Cypress for a project
- Writing BDD feature files with Gherkin syntax
- Designing smoke tests for post-deployment verification
- Debugging flaky E2E tests
- Deciding how many E2E tests to write for a feature
E2E vs Integration: The Boundary
E2E tests cover things integration tests cannot:
- Real browser rendering and JavaScript execution (layout, event handling, hydration)
- Full stack traversal: UI → API → DB → UI response cycle
- Multi-step user journeys across pages, sessions, and auth boundaries
Cost of Each Test Level
| Type | Speed | Flakiness Risk | Maintenance Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | ms | Very low | Low |
| Integration | seconds | Low | Medium |
| E2E | 10s–minutes | High | High |
The Honeycomb Model
Prefer more service-level integration tests over E2E tests. E2E tests are expensive to write, slow to run, and prone to flakiness. Use them sparingly.
- Write E2E tests only for critical user journeys: login, checkout, core business workflows
- Do not write E2E tests for every edge case — cover those with unit and integration tests
- Aim for: many unit tests → more integration tests → few targeted E2E tests
Playwright Setup and Patterns
Project Setup
npm init playwright@latest
# or add to an existing project:
npm install -D @playwright/test
npx playwright install
Config (playwright.config.ts):
import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test';
export default defineConfig({
testDir: './e2e',
fullyParallel: true,
retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0,
reporter: [['html'], ['list']],
use: {
baseURL: process.env.BASE_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3000',
screenshot: 'only-on-failure',
video: 'retain-on-failure',
trace: 'on-first-retry',
},
projects: [
{ name: 'chromium', use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] } },
],
webServer: {
command: 'npm run start',
url: 'http://localhost:3000',
reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI,
},
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 416 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 2864669588f9
solution-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository kid-sid/codex-spellbook (21 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…