solution-testing

solution-testing is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from kid-sid/codex-spellbook. It costs 41 tokens per session (3,566 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Guidance for testing complete user journeys through a web application, including browser, server, and database behaviour. It also covers BDD, a testing approach that describes expected behaviour in plain-language scenarios such as Given, When, and Then.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write Playwright or Cypress browser tests, test full-stack journeys, create BDD scenarios, set up post-release checks, or investigate unreliable end-to-end tests.
Why use it?
It helps verify that a feature works from the user's perspective, not just inside individual pieces of code. It also explains the trade-offs of slower, more maintenance-heavy browser tests.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import { LoginPage } from '../pages/login.page';.

Good fit Use it to write Playwright or Cypress browser tests, test full-stack journeys, create BDD scenarios, set up post-release checks, or investigate unreliable end-to-end tests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kid-sid/codex-spellbook
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for solution-testing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for solution-testing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kid-sid/codex-spellbook/solution-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,566 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.03566
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.01426
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00713
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00357

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 2864669588f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

solution-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/solution-testing/SKILL.md · 416 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Solution Testing

End-to-end and acceptance testing techniques for verifying that a feature works correctly across the full stack — browser, API, and data layer — from the user's perspective.

When to Activate

  • Writing browser automation tests for user journeys
  • Verifying a full feature works end-to-end (UI through DB)
  • Setting up Playwright or Cypress for a project
  • Writing BDD feature files with Gherkin syntax
  • Designing smoke tests for post-deployment verification
  • Debugging flaky E2E tests
  • Deciding how many E2E tests to write for a feature

E2E vs Integration: The Boundary

E2E tests cover things integration tests cannot:

  • Real browser rendering and JavaScript execution (layout, event handling, hydration)
  • Full stack traversal: UI → API → DB → UI response cycle
  • Multi-step user journeys across pages, sessions, and auth boundaries

Cost of Each Test Level

Type Speed Flakiness Risk Maintenance Cost
Unit ms Very low Low
Integration seconds Low Medium
E2E 10s–minutes High High

The Honeycomb Model

Prefer more service-level integration tests over E2E tests. E2E tests are expensive to write, slow to run, and prone to flakiness. Use them sparingly.

  • Write E2E tests only for critical user journeys: login, checkout, core business workflows
  • Do not write E2E tests for every edge case — cover those with unit and integration tests
  • Aim for: many unit tests → more integration tests → few targeted E2E tests

Playwright Setup and Patterns

Project Setup

npm init playwright@latest
# or add to an existing project:
npm install -D @playwright/test
npx playwright install

Config (playwright.config.ts):

import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test';

export default defineConfig({
  testDir: './e2e',
  fullyParallel: true,
  retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0,
  reporter: [['html'], ['list']],
  use: {
    baseURL: process.env.BASE_URL ?? 'http://localhost:3000',
    screenshot: 'only-on-failure',
    video: 'retain-on-failure',
    trace: 'on-first-retry',
  },
  projects: [
    { name: 'chromium', use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] } },
  ],
  webServer: {
    command: 'npm run start',
    url: 'http://localhost:3000',
    reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI,
  },
});

Read the full file on GitHub · 416 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 416 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 2864669588f9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

solution-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository kid-sid/codex-spellbook (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

eval-dataset-design

A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.

bojieli/ai-agent-book · 138 tokens

verify-omnigent

Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 100 tokens

test-master

Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…

Jeffallan/claude-skills · 104 tokens

dogfood

Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.

callstack/agent-device · 55 tokens

cua-driver

Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.

davidondrej/skills · 68 tokens

critique

Adversarial design critique of the current work — render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.

plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills · 37 tokens