Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh --skill analyzing-api-gateway-access-logsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00404 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
分析 API 网关访问日志
使用说明
解析 API 网关访问日志,识别攻击模式,包括对象级别授权缺失(BOLA)、过度数据暴露和注入尝试。
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_json("api_gateway_logs.json", lines=True)
# 检测 BOLA:同一用户访问大量不同资源 ID
bola = df.groupby(["user_id", "endpoint"]).agg(
unique_ids=("resource_id", "nunique")).reset_index()
suspicious = bola[bola["unique_ids"] > 50]
关键检测模式:
- BOLA/IDOR:顺序资源 ID 枚举
- 通过 Header 操纵绕过速率限制
- 凭据扫描(单一来源的 401 激增)
- 查询参数中的 SQL/NoSQL 注入
- 只读端点上的异常 HTTP 方法(DELETE、PATCH)
示例
# 检测 401 激增,指示凭据扫描
auth_failures = df[df["status_code"] == 401]
scanner_ips = auth_failures.groupby("source_ip").size()
scanners = scanner_ips[scanner_ips > 100]
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 44 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 7a2e36f3f0bc
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs is a skill published in the GitHub repository killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh (44 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 404 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Use when parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection…
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.
analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect BOLA/IDOR attacks, rate limit bypass, credential scanning, and injection attempts. Uses pandas for statistical analysis of request patterns and anomaly detection. Use when investigating API abuse or building API-specific threat detection rules.